My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2003
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
4855
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0506650
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:12 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 8:15:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1998-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0506650
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007571
FACILITY_NAME
ARCH ARCO AM PM*
STREET_NUMBER
4855
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
17926051
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4855 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\4855\PR0506650\COMPLIANCE INFO 1998-2003.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site Address: 4855 St Hnj 99 <br /> • *of Testing/Servicing: 2/13/03 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Co lete the following checklist: <br /> Q ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> y ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> Y ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected.functionally tested,and confirmed o erational? <br /> Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their ro er o eration? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> �N/A operational? <br /> Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to ope�rat�eJ�''r is electrically disconnec If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) LXSump/Trench Sensors; ispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill waming device (Le. no <br /> N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and 2perating properIy9 If so,at what percent of tank ca aci does the alarm trigger? ????% <br /> Yes* [j No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors,probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> M_Yes* ElNo Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ <br /> Product; Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ,B—Yes [INo* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settin s? <br /> Yes ❑ No* I Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's s ecifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> V1;1 Lb 2ooD <br /> V 41 <br /> 03101 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.