My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2010-2012
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
4943
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0506488
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:12 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 8:17:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2010-2012
RECORD_ID
PR0506488
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007458
FACILITY_NAME
7-ELEVEN INC #32190
STREET_NUMBER
4943
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4943 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\4943\PR0506488\COMPLIANCE INFO 2010-2012.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> *itoring System Certification <br /> Site Address 4943 S.KINGSLEY(FRONTAGE RD) Date of Testing/Service: 06/21/2010 <br /> HWY 99 @ ARCH AIRPORT RD <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 329.02 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> X Yes No• Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> 0 Yes ❑No• Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ❑x Yes No• Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ❑X <br /> Yes ❑No• Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br /> interfere with their proper operation? <br /> x Yes No N/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,Is all communications equipment(e.g.modem)operational? <br /> For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> 0 Yes ❑No• Q N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected?If yes:which sensors initiate positive <br /> shut-down?(check all that apply) x❑ Sumprfrench Sensors; ❑X Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? [EYes No <br /> Q No' ❑N/A <br /> Yes For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e.:no mechanical <br /> overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s)and operating <br /> properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? <br /> ❑x Yes' No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced and list the <br /> manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> Yes- No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems?(check all that apply) ❑Product; <br /> ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Q Yes ❑No• was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set-up reports,if applicable. <br /> Ex Yes E]No' Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers'specifications? <br /> In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/08 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.