Laserfiche WebLink
' Shaweironmental & Infrastructure, Inc. <br /> 4005 Port Chicago Highway <br /> Concord, CA 94520-1120 <br /> 925.288.9898 <br /> Fax 925.288.0888 <br /> IShaW The Shaw Group Inc."" <br /> IFebruary 4, 2003 <br /> 1 Mr. Andrew Taylor <br /> SBC <br /> ' 2600 Camino Ramon; Room#3E000 <br /> San Ramon, California 94583 <br /> Subject: Letter Report for Temporary UST Closures, Various SBC Facilities, <br /> California <br /> ' Dear Mr. Taylor: <br /> Shaw Environmental Inc. (Shaw) is pleased to present this letter report outlining temporary <br /> ' underground storage tank(UST) closure activities completed at 26 SBC facilities located <br /> throughout California. The temporary tank closure activities were performed in preparation for <br /> future re-use or potential removal in 2003. Field activities were completed in accordance with <br /> the State of California Code of Regulations Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16, Section 2671 UST <br /> temporary closure regulations and specific local oversight agency requirements. A list of the <br /> various SBC sites is included in Table 1. <br /> Field Activities <br /> Prior to performing any field activities, Shaw submitted permit applications to the appropriate <br /> local oversight agencies. Copies of the permits that were issued to Shaw are included in <br /> Attachment 1. SBC had previously arranged for removal of remaining fuel from the USTs or for <br /> the USTs to be used until empty. In addition, Shaw personnel and their subcontractors reviewed <br /> e a site-specific health and safety plan outlining any potential hazards and outline appropriate <br /> responses prior to conducting closure activities. <br /> ' The electrical power to the fuel dispensers was disconnected and locked out/tagged out by <br /> Performance Electrical, Inc. of Modesto, California, with the tank monitoring system remaining <br /> operational. The check valves for the piping were then opened, with the USTs and associated <br /> piping rinsed by hazardous waste-certified subcontractors using a hot-pressure washer and <br /> detergent. Following rinsing, the tanks were then visually inspected to ensure all liquids, solids, <br /> ' or sludge have been removed. <br /> In order to inert the atmosphere of the tanks, dry ice was then placed in the tanks at a rate of at <br /> ' least 20 pounds per 1,000-gallons capacity, with additional dry ice added as needed. Time was <br /> then allowed for the dry ice to displace residual vapors from the tank before measuring the lower <br /> explosive limit(LEL) and percent oxygen within the tanks. Once the oxygen and LEL <br /> ' concentrations were below 10% or permission was given from the regulator to proceed,the <br /> CNCO:ISHAREIUST103-0004.doc <br />