Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department plRFnH <br /> Donna Heron, REHS <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> a: <br /> Rob M COORDINATORS California 95202-3029PROGRAM <br /> rt re , S <br /> - - Jeff Carruesco,REHS, RRi <br /> Kasey Foley, REHS <br /> gt l F O.RN Website: www.Sjgov.org/ehd Linda 7urkatte, REHS <br /> Phone: (209) 468-3420 <br /> Fax: (249)464-0138 <br /> TO: David Irey, Supervising Deputy District Attorney <br /> San Joaquin County District Attorney's Office <br /> Environmental Prosecution Unit <br /> FROM: Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> DATE: January 13, 2012 <br /> RE: Lathrop Gas and Food Mart <br /> 14800 S. Hwy 99 <br /> Manteca, CA 95336 <br /> I. CASE SUMMARY <br /> Lathrop Gas and Food Mart is a fuel dispensing facility with a 10,000-gallon <br /> L, ,derground storage tank (UST) storing 87-octane gasoline, a 10,000-gallon UST <br /> storing diesel, an 8,000-gallon UST storing 91-octane gasoline, and four dispensers. <br /> On December 27, 2011, Mr, Aris Cacapit, Senior Registered Environmental Health <br /> Specialist (REHS), San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD), <br /> performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 1) and witnessed the annual monitoring <br /> system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing. The mechanical <br /> rapper used as overfill prevention in the 87-octane UST was overridden by a stick <br /> placed in the drop tube and the 87-octane spill container and 91-octane leak detector <br /> failed when tested. The 87-octane and 91-octane piping sump sensors were found <br /> located at the lowest point on the opposite side of the product piping in their respective <br /> sumps, rendering them unable to detect a leak at the earliest opportunity. During a <br /> review of the facility's paperwork, Mr. Cacapit found that the financial responsibility <br /> documents were not current, the previous year's monitoring system certification test <br /> report was submitted late, a new designated operator was hired in October 2011 and the <br /> EHD was not notified within 30 days, and two designated operator monthly inspection <br /> reports noted incorrect test dates. Current financial responsibility documents, <br /> designated operator statement, and a return to compliance certification were submitted <br /> to Mr. Cacapit on site (Attachment 2). Attachment 3 includes photos that Mr. Cacapit <br /> took during the inspection. <br /> On December 28, 2011, a permit application, SR0064078, was submitted to replace the <br /> 91-octane leak detector and a drain valve in the 87-octane spill container. Mr. Cacapit <br /> approved the permit the same day(Attachment 4). Later that day, Mr. Cacapit <br /> witnessed the testing of the new 91-octane leak detector and 87-octane spill container <br />