Laserfiche WebLink
Residual fluid had been removed from the tank by pumping it into <br />a vacuum truck. It was then transported to a recycling facility <br />by California Oil Recyclers, Inc., of Newark, California (EPA No. <br />CAD980695761). A copy of the receipt for this transport is <br />included in Appendix A. <br />2.2 Tank Inspection and Field Observations <br />Observations were made by Levine•Fricke personnel during tank <br />removal regarding sediment types encountered and the occurrence <br />of petroleum in tank backfill and native soils exposed during <br />excavation activities. <br />The former tank location and excavation boundary are shown on <br />Figure 2. A 3 -inch thick asphalt pavement covered the <br />underground storage tank area. Depth to the top of the tank was <br />approximately 3 feet below grade. The tank diameter was 8 feet, <br />so that the tank bottom was at a depth of approximately 11 feet <br />below grade. Appurtenant piping attached to the tank included <br />fill pipes, vent pipes, product pipes, and vapor recovery pipes, <br />as shown in Figure 2. No evidence of leakage or holes was <br />observed in the piping during the inspection. <br />After the tank had been emptied and removed, it was visually <br />inspected. The tank was constructed of steel with welded seams; <br />it appeared in good condition. No evidence of leakage or holes <br />was observed during the inspection. <br />•- Visual observations and organic vapor measurements taken using a <br />field photo -ionization detector (PID) indicated that backfill <br />materials (sand) formerly surrounding the tank did not contain <br />indications of petroleum fuel. PID measurements were generally <br />below 5 parts per million (ppm), and only localized pockets of <br />backfill materials in the vicinity of the dispenser island and a <br />portion of the piping trench contained hydrocarbon odors. PID <br />measurements of these localized pockets ranged from 30 to 100 <br />PPM - <br />Native sediments surrounding the tank backfill materials <br />consisted of very stiff, dark grey, silty clay of high plasticity <br />from the surface (underneath the asphalt -pavement section) to a <br />depth of 4 feet. These sediments graded to a stiff, brown, sandy <br />clay of moderate plasticity to depths of at least 14 feet. <br />Visual inspection and PID readings of these soils did not <br />indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in native soils <br />} adjacent to the tank excavation or piping, with the exception of <br />those odors in localized areas noted above. These indicators may <br />have been associated with a small -volume release of fluids <br />remaining in the piping when it was disconnected from the <br />-2- <br />