Laserfiche WebLink
MAR -30-99 TUE 06:30 PM I' RO COMPANIES INC FAX NO. 5104J1 3698 P. 06/07 <br />4.2 Criteria for Steel Structures <br />4.2.1 Corrosion control can be achieved at various levels of cathodic polarization <br />depending on the environmental conditions. However, in the absence of data which <br />demonstrate that adequate cathodic protection has been achieved, one or more of the <br />following shall apply; <br />4.2.1.1 A negative (cathodic) potential of at least 850 mV with the cathodic <br />Protection applied. This potential is measured with respect to a saturated <br />copper/copper sulfate reference electrode contacting the electrolyte. Voltage <br />drops other than those across the structure -to -electrolyte boundary must be <br />considered for valid Interpretation of this voltage measurement. <br />4.2.1.2 A negative polarized potential (see definition in Section 1.2) of at least <br />850 mV relative to a saturated copper/copper sulfate reference electrode. <br />4.2.1.3 A minimum of 100 mV of cathodic polarization. The formation or <br />decay of polarization can be used to satisfy this criterion. <br />4.3 Alternative Reference Electrodes <br />4.3.1 Other standard reference electrodes may be substituted for the saturated <br />copper/coppar sulfate reference electrodes. However, their voltage equivalents need to <br />be converted to the referenced equivalents. <br />4,41 Special Considerations <br />4.4.1 Special cases may exist such as stray currents and stray electrical gradients that <br />require the use of criteria different from those listed above. Measurements for current <br />loss and gain on the structure and current tracing in the electrolyte have been useful n <br />such cases. <br />4.4.2 Abnormal conditions in which protection is ineffective or only partially effective <br />sometimes exist. Such conditions may Include elevated temperatures, disbonded <br />coatings, shielding, bacterial attack, and unusual contaminants in the electrolyte. <br />DATA INTERPRETATION <br />rho assessment of cathodic protection effectiveness is based on the interpretation of <br />structurt-to-soil potentials gathered at points of access to the protected structure. Normal survey <br />techniques require, as a minimum, measurement of a sufficient number of potentials at strategic <br />locations to give a reasonable certainty the measured potentials are representative for the area <br />and structure of concern. This procedure permits the general status of cathodic protection to be <br />assessed on any stricture based on a minimum number of gathered potentials, but it does not <br />prOvidc tine actual status of cathodic protection at all points. In reality, the gathered potentials <br />aro Only valid at the point of measurement, <br />