My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS PHASE II FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LNAPL MOBILITY EVALUATION REPORT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SIXTH
>
720
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009049
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS PHASE II FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LNAPL MOBILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2018 4:37:48 PM
Creation date
11/6/2018 1:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
PHASE II FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LNAPL MOBILITY EVALUATION REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0009049
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004041
FACILITY_NAME
UP TRACY RAIL YARD
STREET_NUMBER
720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
SIXTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25001014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
720 E SIXTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\S\SIXTH\720\PR0009049\PHASE II FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LNAPL MOBILITY EVALUATION REPORT.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phase II Field <br /> ARCAQIS Investigation and LNAPL <br /> Mobility Evaluation Report <br /> Union Pacific Railroad Company <br /> Former Maintenance Facility <br /> ' Tracy, California <br /> also plotted on Figure 14 for reference(field saturation values are indicated by the <br /> solid diamond-shaped markers along each curve). LNAPL velocities ranged from 3.89 <br /> 1 x 10-7 to 6.46 x 10-6 cm/s as seen in Table 8.Appendix G contains the results in <br /> detailed spreadsheet format for each representative site location. Calculated LNAPL <br /> velocities were not calibrated using site-specific transmissivity results from the bail- <br /> down testing for reasons explained in Section 4.1.3. <br /> ASTM guidance indicates that LNAPL seepage velocities less than 1 x 10"6 cm/s <br /> indicate LNAPL in the formation is functionally immobile. LNAPL at LIF-02 and LIF-10 <br /> exceeds ASTM mobility criterion; hence, LNAPL at these locations is confirmed to be <br /> mobile at the pore-scale. These results indicate that LNAPL is able to move vertically <br /> or laterally within the formation at the pore-scale in these areas. This does not imply <br /> that there is plume-scale expansion of the LNAPL plume(s), only that LNAPL at these <br /> locations is capable of moving and redistributing itself within the footprint of the existing <br /> LNAPL plume. LNAPL at LIF-06 and LIF-25 is functionally immobile due to the <br /> calculated pore velocities at field saturations exceeding residual saturations being less <br /> than the ASTM criterion for mobility. <br /> 5.2.4 LNAPL Pore-Entry Pressure Calculations <br /> LNAPL migration into pristine soils occurs when there is sufficient LNAPL head <br /> pressure present in the subsurface at the fringe of the LNAPL plume to displace <br /> groundwater from the soil pores.The calculated critical LNAPL head pressures that are <br /> ' required for lateral LNAPL migration into saturated soils are shown in Table 9. These <br /> head pressures can be converted into critical LNAPL thickness,which is a more easily <br /> measured indicator than head pressure. <br /> The head pressure required for plume expansion, expressed in LNAPL thickness units, <br /> ranges from 4.2 to 8.6 feet. LNAPL accumulations of this magnitude have not been <br /> observed in any monitoring wells on site. Table 9 provides the maximum historical <br /> LNAPL thickness measurements in monitoring wells nearest to each LIF location, <br /> which are all less than half the critical thickness of each respective LIF location. Since <br /> LNAPL thicknesses of these magnitudes have not been observed across the area of <br /> affected groundwater, it is likely the LNAPL plume does not have sufficient LNAPL <br /> volume(and head pressure)to migrate into unaffected soils. <br /> ryt�pr-iracYanap6mgbilily(I i-242010}d c 26 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.