Laserfiche WebLink
S E C O R <br /> DISCUSSION: <br /> Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) were reported in five of the sixteen wells sampled this <br /> quarter at concentrations ranging from 760 ppb (MW-2) to 37,000 ppb (EW-1) Benzene was reported in <br /> two of the sixteen wells at concentrations of 1,500 ppb (MW-4) and 1,100 ppb (EW-1) Methyl tert-butyl <br /> ether (MtBE), analyzed using EPA Method 82606, was reported in eleven of the sixteen wells at <br /> concentrations ranging from 0 76 ppb (MW-3) to 32,000 ppb (MW-6) 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) was <br /> reported in seven of the wells at concentrations ranging from 1 3 ppb (MW-9) to 170 ppb (MW-4) Di- <br /> Isopropyl ether (DIPE) was reported in one well (DMW-1) at a concentration of 5 0 ppb Tert-butyl alcohol <br /> (TBA), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), ethylene dibromide (EDB), and ethyl tert butyl ether (ETBE) were not <br /> detected in any wells this quarter Chemical concentrations were generally consistent with historical data <br /> Groundwater flow within the shallow water-bearing zone was to the northeast at an approximate gradient of <br /> 0 007 ft/ft Groundwater flow within the deeper water-bearing zone was to the northeast at an approximate <br /> gradient of 0 011 ft/ft The groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient reported for the shallow and <br /> deeper water-bearing zones during the fourth quarter 2003 are also consistent with historical data <br /> A remedial performance summary of site remediation activities is included in Attachment A Field and <br /> laboratory procedures are included in Attachment B Certified laboratory analytical reports, chain-of-custody <br /> documentation, and field data sheets are included as Attachment C <br /> Groundwater monitoring and sampling was coordinated with activities performed at former 76 Service <br /> Station No 4409, located northeast of the site Attachment D contains a report prepared by TRC, which <br /> includes groundwater elevations and analytical data for groundwater monitoring wells at the former 76 <br /> Service Station site <br /> �I This report presents our understanding of existing conditions at the subject site The conclusions <br /> contained herein are based on the analytical results, and professional judgment in accordance with <br /> current standards of professional practice, no other warranty is expressed or implied SECOR assumes <br /> no responsibility for exploratory borings or data reported by other consultants or contractors <br /> ATTACHMENTS: <br /> • Table 1 —Groundwater Elevation and Analytical Data <br /> • Table 2--Fuel Oxygenates Analytical Data <br /> • Table 3—Groundwater Gradient Data <br /> • Figure 1 —Groundwater Elevation Contour Map—Shallow Water Bearing Zone <br /> • Figure 2—Groundwater Elevation Contour Map—Deep Water Bearing Zone <br /> • Figure 3—Groundwater Chemical Concentration Map <br /> • Figure 4—MtBE Isoconcentration Contour Map—Shallow Water Bearing Zone <br /> • Figure 5—MtBE Isoconcentration Contour Map—Deep Water Bearing Zone <br /> • Attachment A--Remedial System Performance Evaluation <br /> • Attachment B—Field and Laboratory Procedures <br /> • Attachment C—Certified Laboratory Analytical Report, Chain-of-Custody Documentation, and <br /> Field Data Sheets (ARCO) <br /> • Attachment D—Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report for Former 76 Service Station <br /> No 4409 (TRC) <br /> cc Mr James Barton, Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region (RWQCB-CVA) <br /> Ms Lori Duncan, SJCPHS <br /> Vern Elrath, URS Corporation <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I\ARC0149321QMRs1200314QMR03 doc <br />