Laserfiche WebLink
+1 1 <br /> y i <br /> . page 2, 16 E Harding <br /> The Additional Site Assessment Report documents fieldwork that took place from July 9-16, <br /> 2001,when two soil borings and five shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed The <br /> soil borings were advanced on-site to approximately 80-feet below surface grade (bsg)and depth <br /> discrete sod and groundwater samples were collected for the purpose of defining the vertical <br /> extent of the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination Please note that this report was submitted to <br /> PHS/EHD approximately six weeks late <br /> Analytical results from the sod samples were basically all non-detect, indicating that the limits of <br /> the soil contamination have been defined The bulk of the sod contamination remaining at this <br /> site is in the area of the northern dispenser island, near MW-4 and SVE-1, to a depth of <br /> approximately 40-feet bsg <br /> Analytical results of the discrete water samples collected from SB-1 and SB-2 indicate that <br /> significant petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in groundwater extends to above 65-feet bsg, <br /> and that it has not been defined laterally at this depth Analytical results of the water samples <br /> collected from the shallow wells indicate that lateral definition of the methyl tertiary butyl ether <br /> (MtBE)plume at this depth is not complete, with high concentrations of MtBE present in the <br /> down-gradient well, MW-6 <br /> In this report SECOR recommends further investigation of the contaminant plume in the down- <br /> gradient direction, installation of one deep monitoring well on site, and that a file review be <br /> completed to research possible offsite sources of the contamination present in the up-gradient <br /> well, MW-9 <br /> PHS/EHD agrees with these recommendations However, the lateral extent of the contaminant <br /> plume at depth must also be defined PHSIEHD directs that a minimum of three deep, discretely <br /> screened monitoring wells be installed The installation of these wells was previously directed by <br /> PHSIEHD, and was listed as a condition of the approval of the January 5, 2001 'Work Plan for <br /> Additional Site Assessment' Submit to PHSIEHD by January 21, 2002 a work plan for further <br /> monitoring well installations to complete the plume definition at this site <br /> A feasibility study must be completed for this site,and it must address the issue of remediation of <br /> i <br /> the groundwater contamination The feasibility study, or a work plan to complete further feasibility <br /> testing, is also due to PHSIEHD by January 21, 2002 As discussed in PHSIEHD <br /> correspondence dated November 21, 2000, interim remediation should be on going at this site to <br /> contain the MtBE plume <br /> If you have any questions or comments please call tori Duncan at(209)468-0337 <br /> Donna Heran, RENS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> C.e�Cit + a►►-� <br /> Lori Duncan, Senior REHS Margaret agono, Supervising REHS <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV <br /> cc Marty Hartzell, CVRWQCB <br /> vfkusty Benkosky,SECOR <br />