Laserfiche WebLink
Mr.Frank E. McBee 2 Match 10, 1993 <br /> • The occurrence of the above contaminants are likely the result of <br /> man-made fill imported to the site prior to use of the site as a staging area. <br /> • In addition, samples from the staging area and the test stockpile indicate <br /> elevated levels of semivolatile organic compounds,as measured by <br /> EPA Method 8270, and benzene, toluene and xylene (BTX) as measured <br /> by EPA Method 8240. These compounds are associated with the treated <br /> wood debris. <br /> • Additional analyses were performed on soil and debris samples screened <br /> using a one-quarter inch screen. Analyses on material passing the <br /> one-quarter inch screen indicated a significant reduction of the compounds <br /> associated with the wood debris. <br /> As discussed in the meeting,a report is being completed for submittal to the County which will <br /> present the results of the laboratory analyses, including laboratory QA/QC procedures,locations <br /> of samples collected, and a description of sample collection procedures. <br /> Santa Fe's proposed plan for removal of the wood debris was also reviewed and received verbal <br /> approval from the County and CDF&G. Elements of the proposed plan are summarized as follows: <br /> • Santa Fe's contractor will rake the affected area to collect surface wood <br /> debris. The wood debris will be placed into a closed top roll-off container <br /> which, when full, will be properly disposed at a Class I disposal facility. <br /> Class I disposal of the debris is necessary due to the presence of lead <br /> occurring in background soils. <br /> • Upon a removal of surface wood debris,equipment will be used to loosen <br /> wood debris below the surface and the area will again be raked. <br /> • The above process will be repeated until visible wood debris has been <br /> removed, at which time, samples of underlying soil will be taken to <br /> conium the adequacy of the debris removal. <br /> • Twenty-four hours in advance of collecting the above samples, both <br /> Ms. Violett(San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division) and <br /> Mr. Ramirez(CDF&G) will be contacted for inspection of the site and <br /> to witness the sample collection. <br /> • Samples would be collected from a grid system comprised of 16 grids. <br /> Sixteen samples will be collected and submitted to a certified California <br /> laboratory for analysis. The laboratory, upon receipt, will composite <br /> the 16 samples into 4 composite samples for analysis by EPA <br /> Method 8270. The 4 samples making up an individual composite <br /> will be from adjacent grids. <br /> • Results of the above sampling and analysis will be summarized in a report <br /> and presented to the County,CDF&G, and the California Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board to determine the adequacy of wood debris removal. <br /> During the meeting, the County advised Santa Fe that they had notified Contra Costa County of <br /> activities at the Jersey Island site. Additionally,the County concurred that the lead and other <br /> compounds not associated with the bridge lumber were the responsibility of the landowner. <br /> Santa Fe, however, would be required to properly dispose of the wood debris in light of the lead <br /> and other compounds. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS <br />