My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
1815
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0220065
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2019 10:44:50 AM
Creation date
11/6/2018 8:40:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0220065
PE
2220
FACILITY_ID
FA0001889
FACILITY_NAME
ALCO METALS
STREET_NUMBER
1815
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
1633006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1815 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\222IAError\IAError\N\NAVY\1815\PR0220065\COMPLIANCE INFO 1989 - 2001.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
464
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"For each Major wastestream, evaluate and discuss the <br /> feasibility of implementing, the following changes and any <br /> others you may identify" <br /> This full analysis need be done only!! for viable reduction possibilities. <br /> 1. Input Change— Changes in Raw Materials, which will lead to reduced waste <br /> production. <br /> 2. Operational Changes—Loss prevention, waste segregation,production/maintenance <br /> scheduling, which will lead to reduced waste production. <br /> 3. Process Change—Process changes, equipment modifications, changes in operating <br /> conditions, which will lead to reduced waste production. <br /> 4. Product Reformulations— Changes in the end product by design or composition, <br /> which will lead to reduced waste production. <br /> 5. Administrative Changes—Inventory control, employee programs, training, <br /> incentives, which will lead to waste reduction or prevent generation of waste. <br /> Considerations for the above reduction potentials <br /> 1. Expected change in the amount of waste generated. <br /> 2. Technical Feasibility. <br /> 3. Economic feasibility <br /> 4. Effect on product quality <br /> 5. Employee health and safety impacts. <br /> 6. Permitting Requirements <br /> 7. Releases and Discharges <br /> 8. Other <br /> To evaluate the various reduction potential of your potential measures please use the <br /> following matrix. By dividing the estimated reduction potential by the estimated cost, a <br /> relative comparison factor, (R), can be established for each measure. The comparison <br /> factor multiplied by the weight of waste in the category will give a representation of the <br /> relative reduction value of the proposed measure. This analysis need only include <br /> measures that are reasonable, (doable). <br /> Page 8 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.