My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 1997-2004
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1071
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231431
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 1997-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2024 10:59:45 AM
Creation date
11/7/2018 4:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1997-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0231431
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0000514
FACILITY_NAME
MAIN STREET SHELL*
STREET_NUMBER
1071
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
21707011
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1071 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MAIN\1071\PR0231431\COMPLIANCE INFO 1997-2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
04/14/2004 07:49 4089715 SSS INC PAGE 03 <br /> • <br /> Monitoring System Certification-Page 2 of 3 <br /> Site Address: 1071 N Main St.0Louise _ _ <br /> Date of Testing/Servicing: 3122104 <br /> D. Results of Testing/ Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 119.02 <br /> Cont fete the following checklist: <br /> ®Yes i3 No* Is the audible alarm o erational'? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* is the visual alarm o crational? <br /> a Yes ❑No* Were all sensors visuall inspected,functionally tested, and confirmed operational'? <br /> ®Yes p No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> 0 Yes 0 No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications eglaiptnent(e.g.modem) <br /> 0 N/A vpctativual'1 <br /> ®Yes ❑No* For pressurized piping systems,docs the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑NIA monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, aorr is electrically <br /> allySendisconnected? <br /> n Dispenser s:which sensors <br /> initiate <br /> positivepositive sbut-down? (Check all that apply) <br /> Did you confirm ositive shut-down due to leaks and selisor failure/disconnection? Byes O No <br /> Q Yea ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize rhe monitoring system as the primary Tattle ov�ll wamin?drvicr(i.e.nn <br /> 0 N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill oint(s)and operating ro erl ? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 0 <br /> p yes* No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?it yes, identity spectflc sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑Yes* ® No Was liquid found inside any srrnndary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all th¢t¢pplyj <br /> in Product; ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section L•,below. <br /> 9 Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to cure pro er settmgs? (A trach set-up re a7s, 1 a licable. <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> "In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.