My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 1997-2004
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1071
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231431
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 1997-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2024 10:59:45 AM
Creation date
11/7/2018 4:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1997-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0231431
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0000514
FACILITY_NAME
MAIN STREET SHELL*
STREET_NUMBER
1071
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
21707011
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1071 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MAIN\1071\PR0231431\COMPLIANCE INFO 1997-2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
04/18/2002 17:34 408971. SSS INC PAGE 03 <br /> Monitoring;System Certification-Page 2 of 3 <br /> Site Address; 1071 N Main St. Louise <br /> Date of Testing/Servicing: 03119102 <br /> D, Results of Testing I Servicing <br /> Software'Version Installed• 119.112 <br /> Corn tete the fo-Howin checklist: <br /> 2 Yes ❑No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ®Yes U No* Is tic visual alarm operational? <br /> m Yes ©No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere w.1th their proper operation? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all Communications equipment{e.g. modem) <br /> a N/A operational? <br /> a Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary contairmmlit <br /> ©NIA monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes; which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-dowaiy (Check all that appry) m sumplTrenclt Sensors; a DispcnsGr CuniauuttCul S'cnsors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? X Yes ❑No <br /> ❑Yes ❑ No* for tank systems that utilize the monitoring,system as the primary tank avertill warning device(i.e, no <br /> ®NIA mechanical overfill,prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill Dint{s}and operatinropey'. <br /> rl > If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? Q % <br /> U Yes* ONO Was any monituring cquipuazat jvplaccd. If ycs,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replaccrnent parts in Section E,beiow- <br /> Q Yes* K No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑product; Q Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> M Yes ❑ No* Was monitozing system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up r orts, i a licable. <br /> a Yr$ p Ne* Is all monitoring equipment operratianal p®r manufacturer's specifications' <br /> *In.Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.