Laserfiche WebLink
07 MAY, 2001 <br />MR. DOUG WILSON, REHS <br />SUPERVISOR, UNIT III <br />ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br />304 E. WEBER AVENUE, THIRD FLOOR <br />STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA 95202 <br />DEAR MR. WILSON, <br />:` AP.'P.'LICATION FOR TANK REMOVAL PROJECT A <br />AVENUE, <br />MY CONTRACTOR WHO I HAVE ENGAGED FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE APPROXIMATE <br />1,000 GALLON TANK RECENTLY DISCOVERED AT MY SITE HAS INIDCATED THAT YOU <br />ARE DISSATISFIED REGARDING HIS ANSWERS TO TWO OF YOUR QUESTIONS REGARDING <br />YOUR DEPARTMENT ISSUING THIS TANK REMOVAL PERMIT. YOUR APPLICATION HAS <br />ASKED WHERE CONTAMINATED SOIL WILL BE HAULED TO AND WHO WILL THE HAULER <br />BE. THE QUESTIONS WERE ANSWERED SATISFACTORILY BY THE CONTRACTOR AS WELL <br />AS CORRECTLY. ANY DECISIONS RELATIVE TO DISPOSITION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL <br />WOULD BE MADE AFTER WE KNEW WE HAD CONTAMINATED SOIL AS WELL AS WHAT <br />THE CONTAMINATION WAS AND TO WHAT LEVELS. AS YOU MUST SURELY BE AWARE, <br />PRIOR TO HAULING CONTAMINATED SOIL TO A DISPOSAL SITE, THEY MUST HAVE <br />COPSES OF THE LABORATORY ANALYSIS TO ASCERTAIN IF THEY (THE DISPOSAL <br />FACILITY) IS EVEN PERMITTED TO ACCEPT THE CONTAMINATION AND AT THE LEVELS <br />INDICATED BY' THE REPORT. WE WOULD ALSO WANT TO DETERMINE FOR A CERTAINTY <br />THAT HAULING THE SOIL OFFSITE WOULD BE THE PROPER OPTION. <br />PLEASE KNOW THAT SHOULD CONTAMINATION BE DISCOVERED AT MY PROPERTY <br />WHICH REQUIRES REMEDIATION, I SHALL CERTAINLY ABIDE BY THE LAW TO <br />DEAL WITH SUCH CONTAMINATION, I LOOK FORWARD TO WO2KING WITH MRS. BRIGGS <br />WHO I UNDERSTAND HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO MY SITE. <br />YOURS TRULY', C <br />�r- W� �. <br />JAIGENDER SINGH <br />65C E. MINER AVENUE <br />JS/FY STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA 95202 <br />CC; <br />MRS, L. BRIGGS, REHS <br />