Laserfiche WebLink
PETER <br /> 1 2020 STANDIFORD OVENUE <br /> SUITE D 2 Allp <br /> 2 MODESTO, CA 9 3S 31 <br /> 3 Oo 63 <br /> ATTORNEY FOR HIMSELF <br /> 4 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 JOHN Q SHAUGHNESSY9 <br /> DEFEMDONI ' S OPPOSITION TO <br /> 8 PLAINTIFF, r,i-ori-4,rwrls RESPONSE ro <br /> fl <br /> 9 vs. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. <br /> 10 PETER GInMPnMCOl CASE CONTROL NUMBER 23658 � <br /> 11 DEFENDANT. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br /> 14 COMES NOW PETER oinmBnmco WHO NEED97 THE CONTINUMMUE OF 1 "IS <br /> 15 .TRIAL FOUR TO SIX MONTHS rROM THE SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE OF' <br /> 16 SEPTEMBER 15, 1992. HERE FOLLOWS THE RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION By <br /> THE PLAINTIFF. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 <br /> 19 1 . ) THE FINAL DECISION WAS NOT MADE= UNTIL A FEW DnYs PRIOR TO <br /> 20 THE -SUES STITUTION OF nITORNEYS- THAT IT WAS DEFINITE THAT I WOULI) <br /> 21 NO LONGER BE REPRESENTED BY ROGER POOL. THIS IS APPROXIMATELY <br /> 22 TWENTY DAYS noo. I WPS TRYING TO DO SOME REFINANCING FoR FUNDS, <br /> 20 SEE EXHIBIT A. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 WE HAVE NOT PAID ANYTHING TO MR. SHAUGHNESSY OVER A PERIOD OF' <br /> 26 TIME BY INSTRUCTIONS FROM COUNCIL. MR. SHAUGHNESSY SOLD ME <br /> 27 PROPERTY THAT WnS COMTnMIMnTED AND HE WAS TOTALLY AWARE Or THIS. <br /> 28 <br />