My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2005 - 2010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
10878
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231598
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2005 - 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:12 PM
Creation date
11/8/2018 9:48:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2005 - 2010
RECORD_ID
PR0231598
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001146
FACILITY_NAME
MORADA CHEVRON FAST N EASY #60*
STREET_NUMBER
10878
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
APN
08607002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
10878 N HWY 99 E
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\N\HWY 99\10878\PR0231598\COMPLIANCE INFO 2005 - 2010 .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2005 - 2010
QuestysRecordDate
5/17/2017 6:13:49 PM
QuestysRecordID
3384372
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • f r <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 329.00 <br /> om lete the following checklist: <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No• Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not Interfere with their proper <br /> operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No' If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.,modem)operational? <br /> ® N/A <br /> ® Yes ❑ Ni For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, <br /> ❑ N/A fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ® Sumprrrench <br /> Sensors; ❑Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ®Yes; ❑ No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No` For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e., no mechanical overfill prevention valve is <br /> ® N/A installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity <br /> does the alarm trigger? <br /> ❑ ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors, probes,or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name <br /> and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> Yes <br /> ❑ ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Yes <br /> ® Yes ❑ No' Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers specifications? <br /> •In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 2/21/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.