My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2005 - 2010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
10878
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231598
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2005 - 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:12 PM
Creation date
11/8/2018 9:48:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2005 - 2010
RECORD_ID
PR0231598
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001146
FACILITY_NAME
MORADA CHEVRON FAST N EASY #60*
STREET_NUMBER
10878
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
APN
08607002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
10878 N HWY 99 E
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\N\HWY 99\10878\PR0231598\COMPLIANCE INFO 2005 - 2010 .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2005 - 2010
QuestysRecordDate
5/17/2017 6:13:49 PM
QuestysRecordID
3384372
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jan 20 05 09: 39a Rffa -Test (2093 4-0112 P• 3 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> PYes <br /> No* Is the audible alarm operational? _ <br /> No* Is the visual alarm operational? _ <br /> No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed opemtional? <br /> M'YNo* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment 1 <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. mod21F/A operational? <br /> Yes 13No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary contains <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operat is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors init <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) E Surnp/Trench Sensors; EIDispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? 13Yes; C'fifo. <br /> [o Yes ❑ 1W For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. <br /> p�N/A mechanical overfill prevention.valve is installed),is the overfill waming alarm visible and audible at the C <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? <br /> EI Yes* No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment repla( <br /> _ and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systemsT (Check all that app <br /> ❑Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes.in Section E,below. <br /> Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.