My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2008-2015
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
3550
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0505827
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2008-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:12 PM
Creation date
11/8/2018 9:49:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2008-2015
RECORD_ID
PR0505827
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007030
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY PACIFIC HWY 99 CARDLOCK
STREET_NUMBER
3550
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
17916043
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3550 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\N\HWY 99\3550\PR0505827\COMPLIANCE INFO 2008-2015.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification `` r' <br /> EE <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing APR 2 0 2015 <br /> Software Version Installed: 329.01 ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> ldc�'TrJ nc9!9T11c�1T <br /> Complete the followin2 checklist: <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g., modem) <br /> ❑ N/A operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ® Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ® Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no <br /> M N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? _% <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* M No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach setup reports, if applicable <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of a <br /> UN-036— www.unidocs.org Rev.01/17/08 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.