Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring System Certification <br /> Situ Address: 3515 NAVY DRIVE,STOC:OON _ Date ofpsting/Servicing: 11/13/06 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: N/A <br /> Complete the foil hit checklist: <br /> ® Yes 1 IN/A <br /> Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ❑ Yes Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes Were all sensors visual) inspected,functional) tested,and confirmed operational?. <br /> ® Yes Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment <br /> will not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> operational? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors <br /> initiate positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment <br /> Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks An sensor failure/disconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> ® N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating ro rl If so at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? ????*/o <br /> ® Yes* ❑ No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? if yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment <br /> replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all re lacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E below. <br /> 0 Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system %et-up reviewed to ensure r er settin s? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is all monitorin ui ment o =rational per manufacturer's s ecdications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: _.._ <br /> LS-7 ANNULAR SENSOR WAS REPLACED LIKE FOR LIKE AFTER BEING FOUND IN BAD <br /> CONDITION. NEW LS-7 SENSOR IS IN WORKING CONDITION PRESENTLY, AND NO OTHER <br /> REPAIRS ARE NEEDED AT PRESENT TIME. <br /> Page 2 of 2 05/61 <br /> goo In 'IVIN931MOHIAMM ,LIVL TTOT9299T6 %V3 0:LT 90OZ/6T/TT <br />