Laserfiche WebLink
Jeff Wong [EH] <br /> From: Jeff Wong [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:11 AM <br /> To: Kasey Foley [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: Results/EDD/Invoice - LINDEN UST Removal (1403251) - State Route <br /> Attachments: image001.jpg;ATT00001.htm; 1403251.pdf,ATT00002.htm; 1403251.xls;ATT00003.htm; <br /> inv0015101.pdf;ATT00004.htm; 1403251 reanalysis.pdf <br /> K: <br /> Clem sent me the results:they ran the first sample (1403251.pdf) and came back high in Pb: <br /> 110 mg/kg total <br /> 25 mg/L STLC <br /> 0.078 mg/L TCLP; therefore HW for STLC. <br /> Clem didn't like it and had a 2"a sample analyzed (1403251 reanalysis): 72 mg/kg total, and 2.1 mg/L STLC;therefore non <br /> HW. <br /> So is this 2 n composite sample acceptable? He's trying to use the sample to cover everything to be hauled as non-HW: <br /> content,the tank itself(pieces of it anyway), and any kind of"dry-scrapping" (in place of triple rinse). <br /> Reference limits: <br /> TTLC: 1000 mg/kg <br /> STLC: 5 mg/L(X10= 50) <br /> TCLP: 5 mg/L(x20= 100) <br /> — ------------------------------------- -----From: Goewert, Clemens@DOT [mailto:clemens.goewert(&dot.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:16 AM <br /> To: Jeff Wong [EH] <br /> Cc: Bob Kimball <br /> Subject: FW: Results/EDD/Invoice - LINDEN UST Removal (1403251) - State Route <br /> Jeff, <br /> Attached is the analytical results for the initial sampling of the tank contents. <br /> Some of the metal concentrations confused us. Geocon then had the lab recomposite the tank contents <br /> samples, while making sure there was no metal from the tank in the soil sample. The result of the reanalysis <br /> for lead is attached. The lead concentrations totally changed. <br /> Bob Kimball is checking with Ostrom Landfill to accept the waste. <br /> Bob found the bottom of the tank was in poor condition, and may not be recyclable. <br /> Please review the results. <br /> Contact me, if you have questions. <br /> 1 <br />