My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2012
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
707
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0505151
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2020 4:40:09 PM
Creation date
11/8/2018 10:03:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2006 - 2012
RECORD_ID
PR0505151
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007815
FACILITY_NAME
QUICKI KLEEN CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
707
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
707 E YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\Y\YOSEMITE\707\PR0505151\COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2012 .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2012
QuestysRecordDate
7/19/2016 8:32:58 PM
QuestysRecordID
3145718
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification CFO& <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 2.05 <br /> Com lete the fonowin checklist: <br /> D Yes ❑ No* I Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> 0 Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm o erational? <br /> 0 Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> RI Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> 2 N/A operational? <br /> 2Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) 0 Sump/Trench Sensors; 0 Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? 0 Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> 2 N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fillpoint(s)and operating roperl ? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? _% <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors,probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑Yes* Rl No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑ Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> [0 Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports, if applicable <br /> ❑ Yes 2 No* i Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> --i-in Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> 87 Middle tank LLD failed its leak test. <br /> Note: 1 large tank with 3 compartments with 1 annular 420 sensors. <br /> UN-036-2/4 Page 2 of 4 Rev.06/04/01 <br /> vmw.unidoes.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.