My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 1987 - 2007
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
244
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231137
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 1987 - 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2023 1:16:56 PM
Creation date
11/8/2018 10:22:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1987 - 2007
RECORD_ID
PR0231137
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001554
FACILITY_NAME
MIRACLE MILE MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
244
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
13708014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
244 W HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\H\HARDING\244\PR0231137\COMPLIANCE INFO 1987 - 2007 .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 1987 - 2007
QuestysRecordDate
7/21/2016 3:39:19 PM
QuestysRecordID
3146929
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oct 30 07 12: 25p Rfforda Test [209) 744-0116 p. 2 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> l_. <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> Yes ❑ No` Is the audible alarm o17rational? <br /> Yes ❑-No* Is the visual alarmoperational?- <br /> J4 <br /> Yes ❑ No' Were all sensorsvisuafly inspected.functionally tested.and confirmed operational? <br /> Yes ❑ No' Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper o cration? <br /> 0 Yes ❑ No' If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> Pf N/A operational? <br /> I$ Yes ❑ No' For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> O N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate,or is electrically disco netted? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply))d Sump/Trench Sensors; A Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and scrisor failure/disconnection? NPVes; O No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No' For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (ix. no <br /> N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm tri ger? % <br /> O Yes' No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section F„below. <br /> ENo Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ <br /> Product; ❑ Water. If es,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ No' Was monitorin s stem set-upreviewed to ensure propel settin ? Attach set u repo tS. if a licable <br /> ❑ No' Is ail monitoring equipment oerational per manufacturer's s ecifications? <br /> • [n Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of3 03g] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.