Laserfiche WebLink
URS <br /> Mr. Ray von Flue <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> January 23, 2003 <br /> Page 3 <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the analytical data collected during the above-described field work, detectable levels <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons were not present in the soil beneath the USTs, dispenser islands, <br /> and piping. URS is recommending that no further remedial action is necessary for this site. <br /> This report presents our understanding of existing conditions at the subject site. The <br /> conclusions contained herein are based on the analytical results, and professional judgment in <br /> accordance with current standards of professional practice; no other warranty is expressed or <br /> implied. URS assumes no responsibility for exploratory borings or data reported or supplied by <br /> other consultants or contractors. <br /> If you have questions or comments regarding this report,please call us at(916)679-2299. <br /> Sincerely, RED GE , <br /> URS Corporation Americas ��v �ON PAUf CxJ� <br /> i <br /> No.. 12 <br /> Vernon Elarth,R.G. * Exp. ` �t <br /> Project Manager d' ��\P <br /> Attachments: Table 1 Soil Imt T,Dispenser and Product Line <br /> Remova <br /> Table 2 Soil Analytical Data-Stockpiled Soil and Pea Gravel <br /> Figure 1 Site Location Map <br /> Figure 2 Soil Sample Locations <br /> Attachment A UST Removal Permits <br /> Attachment B UST and Piping Disposal Documentation <br /> Attachment C Field and Laboratory Procedures <br /> Attachment D Field Notes <br /> Attachment E Certified Analytical Laboratory Reports and Chain-of- <br /> Custody Documentation <br /> cc: Mr. Paul Supple,ARCO <br /> Ms. Kateri Luka,ARCO(3 copies) <br /> Project and Chron File <br /> JABP-ARCOWern's Fles\Station No.00434\UST Removal\UST removal 2nd repon.doc <br />