Laserfiche WebLink
.. <br /> URS <br /> r <br /> Mr. Ray von Flue <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> November 14,2002 <br /> Page 3 <br /> r <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the analytical data collected during the above-described field work, detectable levels <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons were not present in the soil beneath the USTs, dispenser islands, <br /> and piping. URS is recommending that no further remedial action is necessary for this site. <br /> This report presents our understanding of existing conditions at the subject site. The <br /> conclusions contained herein are based on the analytical results, and professional judgment in <br /> accordance with current standards of professional practice; no other warranty is expressed or <br /> implied. URS assumes no responsibility for exploratory borings or data reported or supplied by <br /> other consultants or contractors. <br /> If you have questions or comments regardi report, please call us at(916)679-2299. <br /> D GEp�� <br /> Sincerely, ��FRE <br /> pAUC <br /> URS Corporation Americas <br /> Vernon120 <br /> Elarth,R.G. * Exp. t I <br /> Project Manager <br /> r Attachments: Table 1 SolF CA�F� a—UST,Dispenser and Product Line <br /> Removal <br /> Table 2 Soil Analytical Data- Stockpiled Soil and Pea Gravel <br /> Figure 1 Site Location Map <br /> Figure 2 Soil Sample Locations <br /> Attachment A Field and Laboratory Procedures <br /> r Attachment B Certified Analytical Laboratory Reports and Chain-of- <br /> Custody Documentation <br /> Attachment C UST and Piping Disposal Documentation <br /> r <br /> Attachment D UST Removal Permits <br /> cc: Mr.Paul Supple,ARCO <br /> ` Ms.Kateri Luka,ARCO(3 copies) <br /> Project and Chron File <br /> K US BP ARCO\00434\UST Removal\UST removal report.doc <br />