Laserfiche WebLink
07/22!2009 14:13 FAX 209 744 0116 <br />SWRCB, January 2002 <br />4. , TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br />00002/0006 <br />Page 2— of —7 <br />Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer 0 Industry Standard Q Professional Engineer <br />Other (Spec) <br />Test Method Used: Q Pressure acuum Q Hydrostatic <br />Q Other (Specify) <br />Test Equipment Used: s� u celttuas� {uG , Rr= E Equipment Resolution: <br />r <br />Tank #.� z, Z `Tank # Tank # �� Wank # <br />Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' <br />Q Yes o <br />0 Yes 0 No <br />0 Yes Q No <br />; Q Yes Q No ; <br />Tank Capacity: <br />Tank Material: <br />(t tee 44 1. <br />j <br />Tank Manufacturer: <br />P1'O (,t) <br />Product Stored: <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/acu ater and <br />startingtest. <br />; <br />Test Start Time: <br />Initial Reading (Rt): <br />-- /O/V i <br />p` <br />Y <br />Test End Time: <br />/ (,'-36; <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />Test Duration: <br />i <br />Change in Reading (RF -R,): <br />j <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />Test Result: <br />Pass 0 Fail <br />0 Pass Q Fitil <br />QA Pass i kFail <br />0 Pass 0 Rail <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />Yes Q No 0 NAYes <br />Q No Q NA <br />es Q No 'd NA <br />0 Yes Q No 0 NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? <br />�es Q No 0 NA <br />Q Yes Q No Q N� <br />Yes Q No Q SIA <br />' <br />11Yes Q No 0 NA <br />Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing and reco►nmended follow-up forfailed tests) <br />' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br />containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br />testing. {Califomia Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />