My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SAN JOAQUIN
>
640
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518459
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2018 4:49:51 PM
Creation date
11/30/2018 4:03:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0518459
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0013913
FACILITY_NAME
HERITAGE SQUARE
STREET_NUMBER
640
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SAN JOAQUIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13916110
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
640 N SAN JOAQUIN ST
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r]Rase H Environmental Site Assessment <br /> Heritage Square <br /> Page 4 <br /> diameter cutting shoe The hand auger borings were manually using a 3- <br /> inch diameter bucket. <br /> The cutting shoe, hand auger bucket, and associated push rods were thoroughly cleaned before each use <br /> with laboratory-grade, non..phosphate detergent and de-ionized water and double-rinsed with de-ionized <br /> water. Upon completion of the drilling and sampling, the direct pushboreholes were backfilled with grout <br /> and the hand auger boreholes were backfilled with clean aggregate base and capped with concrete. <br /> 4.3.1 Soil Sampling <br /> Soil samples were collected from each Geoprobe° boring from approximately two feet below the bottom <br /> of the respective nearby UST and at five-foot intervals thereafter to a depth of 10 feet below the deepest <br /> evidence of hydrocarbon contamination or 30 feet bgs, whichever was greater. A minimum of two soil <br /> samples from each boring were retained for laboratory analyses. Borings B-1, B-2, and B-4 were <br /> advanced to approximate depths of 20 feet bgs, and borings B-6 through B-8 were advanced to <br /> approximate depths of 16 feet bgs. As field observations indicated that contamination was present in <br /> boring B-3 east of TK 1, samples were collected at less than five-foot intervals through the impacted zone, <br /> a total of seven samples from the boring were retained for analyses, and the boring was advanced to a <br /> depth of 36 feet bgs. Obvious indicators of contamination were present near T.K2 in boring B-5 as well, <br /> and a total of three samples from this boring were retained for analyses and the boring was advanced to a <br /> depth of 40 feet bgs. Groundwater samples were also collected from each of these impacted borings. <br /> Sample depths for borings B-1 through B-8 are indicated on the geologic logs in Appendix B.Borings C- <br /> 1 through C-4 were advanced to approximately two feet beneath the underground piping. Soil samples <br /> were collected from this depth for each of these borings. <br /> Soil samples were collected from the Geoprobe" borings using a 2-inch outside diameter, 4-foot long core <br /> barrel, fitted with a clean, single use, acetate liner. Soil samples were collected from the hand auger <br /> borings by driving a sampling sleeve into the soil with a slide hammer. The soil sampling equipment was <br /> cleaned prior to boring the next hole and the cutting shoe and sampling sleeve were cleaned prior to <br /> collecting each sample by washing them in a solution of laboratory-grade, non-phosphate detergent and <br /> deionized water, and double-rinsing with de-ionized water. <br /> During the soil sampling, the Geoprobe"' core barrel was driven continuously in four-foot intervals to <br /> between 16 feet and 40 feet bgs. After the core barrel was driven four feet, the core barrel was withdrawn <br /> and the sample was removed. The sample liner was extracted from the core barrel and used for geologic <br /> logging and field observations. A new unused acetate liner was placed in the core barrel and the process <br /> was repeated. All soil samples were logged according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). <br /> Geologic logs were prepared containing field observations including soil type, estimated moisture <br /> content, photo ionization detector (PID) measurements, and the presence of staining or odor. The geologic <br /> logs are included in Appendix B. Each soil sample selected for potential laboratory analyses was cut from <br /> the liner. The soil samples were retained, undisturbed, in the liners. The liners were sealed at the ends <br /> with Teflon sheeting, capped, and labeled. The samples were stored in a cooler chilled with Blue Ices <br /> and delivered under chain-of-custody procedures to Excelchem .Environmental Labs (Excelchem) of <br /> Roseville, California. The samples were analyzed using U.S. EPA and California approved methods. <br /> L� 4.3.2 Groundwater Sampling <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from two of the Geoprobe° borings, B-3 and B-5. The borings were <br /> completed to termination and then new PVC casing and riser were placed in the open boreholes. <br /> Groundwater flowed hydrostatically from the formation into the inlet screen. A groundwater sample was <br /> retrieved from within the screen with a length of clean,318-inch diameter poly tubing with a check valve <br /> at the bottom. The tubing was pumped up and down by hand to draw groundwater up the tubing. The <br /> is CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.