Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kirk Williams • - 5 - • 25 April 2008 <br /> The new laboratory does not appear to include 1,2,3-TCP in its fumigant analytical suite <br /> (EPA 504.1). <br /> A discussion of these limitations follows. <br /> Water Quality Objectives <br /> The compounds of bromacil and 2,4-D appear at concentrations below the applicable water <br /> quality objectives. For these compounds, Western Farm Service requests that they be <br /> removed from the analytical program. While these constituents are below their respective <br /> water quality objectives, the cleanup goal for groundwater ranges from background <br /> concentrations up to the water quality objective. Since these constituents are not naturally <br /> occurring, Regional Water Board staff cannot dismiss them as constituents of concern. <br /> Prior to 2004, bromacil, a carbamate/urea compound and 2,4-D, a chlorinated herbicide, were <br /> identified at concentrations of about 2 ug/L, more than 10 times lower than their water quality <br /> objective of 70 ug/L. After 2004, bromacil was not included in the analytical suites, and the <br /> detection limit for 2,4-D was raised to 5 ug/L. In our 15 February telephone conversation, <br /> Regional Water Board staff and GeoSyntec Consultants agreed that we would assume that <br /> bromacil is present in the wells it has been observed in the past (MW-2, MW-14A, and MW-6) <br /> and Western Farm Service will specifically analyze for bromacil in these wells and in MW-8 <br /> when the MRP is revised again. Similarly, a lower detection limit for chlorinated herbicides <br /> will be required before Regional Water Board staff can determine that the compounds are not <br /> present. <br /> Some of the monitoring wells contain sufficient concentrations of 1,2,3-TCP to warrant using a <br /> less expensive analysis than the low-level method. <br /> Paper Reduction <br /> Several changes have been proposed to the reporting format to address GeoSyntec's request <br /> to reduce the size of the semi-annual reports. The most recent five years of monitoring data <br /> should be tabulated in the report, and the entire cumulative monitoring data may be submitted <br /> in a spreadsheet on electronic media. The format of the spreadsheet should be to facilitate <br /> data transfer into a database. In addition, the laboratory data reports and field logs may be <br /> provided on electronic media. <br /> SCHEDULE <br /> In a 25 March 2008 telephone meeting with Ms. Carolyn Kneilblher and Mr. Arnab Chakrabarti <br /> of Geosyntec the following schedules were agreed upon: <br /> • By 6 June 2008, please provide comments on the attached draft Monitoring and Reporting <br /> Program. <br /> • By 20 June 2008, Western Farm Service will provide a work plan to obtain vadose zone <br /> soil samples from beneath the north and south ponds and groundwater water samples <br /> from beneath the south pond. Care shall be taken to not disturb the integrity of the pond <br /> caps and liners. <br />