My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BROADWAY
>
1905
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518600
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 10:53:10 AM
Creation date
12/7/2018 10:30:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518600
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013996
FACILITY_NAME
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES
STREET_NUMBER
1905
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
BROADWAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14315004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1905 N BROADWAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
626
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES <br /> - 2 - <br /> My specific comments are listed for each section of the report, as follows: <br /> Executive Summa <br /> 1. The document states that the shallow groundwater contains up to 44 µg/] 1,2-DCP. <br /> two significantly higher concentrations have been detected: in to 4 MW-2 had 160 <br /> in 1995, MW-6 had 88 Actually, <br /> k g/l' k g/I, while <br /> 2. The "basic risk analysis" was not conducted per the Board's guidance for health risk assessments. <br /> A copy of the guidance memo is attached. In addition, there appears to be a basic <br /> misunderstanding of the Board's policy regarding sources of drinking <br /> Basin Plan, except under specific circumstances, all groundwaters are to be protected as existing <br /> or potential sources of municipal or domestic water supply. <br /> water. As stated in the <br /> PP Y• <br /> 3. The report contains an outdated and inaccurate water quality criterion for 1,2-DCP. As listed in <br /> staff report A Compilation of Water Quality Goals (July 1995; updated April 1996 <br /> criteria have been published for 1,2-DCP: <br /> ), the following <br /> California Primary MCL: <br /> USEPA Primary MCL: 5 p g/l <br /> USEPA MCL Goal: 5 µg/1 <br /> Calif Recommended Public Health Level (proposed): zero <br /> USEPA Health Advisory (for toxicity other than cancer risk): 5 lug/l <br /> Cal/EPA Cancer Potency Factor (1-in-a-million cancer risk)) 90 0 56 9/1 (10-day) <br /> USEPA IRIS (1-in-a-million cancer risk) k8/l <br /> USEPA Health Advisory (probably human carcinogen) 0.5 t`g/1 <br /> 1.O In_ trod 0.5 µgIl <br /> I. The maximum listed concentration of 1,2-DCP is in error. <br /> 2. Site investigations have shown that the nitrates and 1,2-DCP in the groundwater are due to the <br /> disposal of waste products into the oil-water separator and three dry wells, as well as the disposal <br /> of rinsewater to the evaporation ponds. <br /> 2.4 Groundwater Chemistry <br /> I think it is important to relate the chemicals that have been found in the groundwater to regulatory <br /> limits, as this shows whether there is a basis for further environmental work. The report does not do <br /> this, so I have summarized the information in the following table. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.