My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BROADWAY
>
1905
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518600
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 10:53:10 AM
Creation date
12/7/2018 10:30:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518600
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013996
FACILITY_NAME
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES
STREET_NUMBER
1905
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
BROADWAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14315004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1905 N BROADWAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
626
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES - 4 - <br /> 4.3 <br /> 4 -4.3 Toxicity and Health Risks <br /> Outdated water quality criteria are given for 1,2-DCP. (See comment #3 for the Executive Summary <br /> for the most recent criteria). I don't understand why 1,2-DCP is compared to 1,3-DCP, since <br /> 1,3-DCP isn't a breakdown product and hasn't been found at this site. <br /> 4.4 Establishment of Action Levels <br /> The Basin Plan describes the method the Board is to use in setting groundwater cleanup levels. <br /> Groundwater cleanup levels are "equal to background concentrations if background levels are <br /> technologically and economically feasible to achieve. If background levels are infeasible to achieve, <br /> cleanup levels are set between background concentrations and concentrations that" protect beneficial <br /> uses of the waterbody and do not pose a significant risk to human health or the environment. "Within <br /> this concentration range, cleanup levels must be set at the lowest concentrations that are <br /> technologically and economically achievable." <br /> Based on the above, if 1,2-DCP were the only chemical in the groundwater beneath the site, then the <br /> cleanup level would initially be set at background (non-detect) and if necessary, would rise to 0.5 µg1I <br /> (the human health protective level). However, 1,2-DCP is not the only chemical in the groundwater. <br /> A human health risk assessment is necessary to determine the concentration of the chemicals which <br /> will not pose a significant risk to human health. <br /> 5.0 Alternatives for Removal of 1,2-DCP from Groundwater <br /> The report contains a quote "...an aquifer receiving a continuous supply of contaminants is extremely <br /> difficult to renovate; decontamination of groundwaters is often uneconomical and in some cases <br /> technically infeasible." This quote is not germane to the discussion because State and Regional Board <br /> policies require a discharger to remove the source of contamination. <br /> 5.1 Pumping and Treating with Activated Carbon <br /> The document contains a quote about DNAPLs, and the failure of pump and treat systems when <br /> DNAPLs are present. 1,2-DCP will behave as a Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid when it is present <br /> at such a high concentration that it is not dissolved throughout the water column, but instead is found <br /> as a liquid which has sunk to the bottom of the water-bearing zone. No evidence has been presented <br /> to suggest that the 1,2-DCP found at this site is behaving in such a manner. <br /> 5.2 Pumping and Air Stripping <br /> Depending on the Air Quality Management District, and the pounds of gas to be vented, it is still <br /> possible to vent air strippers directly to the atmosphere. <br /> 5.3 Hydraulic Containment <br /> Again, the report contains a quote about DNAPLs. However, 1,2-DCP is not behaving as a DNAPL, <br /> so this quote is unnecessary. <br /> 5.6.3 Vaporization <br /> The document states that 1,2-DCP "will continue to vaporize from groundwater until it can no longer <br /> be detected." Given the physical conditions at this site, how long will it take for 1,2-DCP to vaporize <br /> from the groundwater until it can no longer be detected? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.