My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BROADWAY
>
1905
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518600
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 10:53:10 AM
Creation date
12/7/2018 10:30:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518600
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013996
FACILITY_NAME
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES
STREET_NUMBER
1905
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
BROADWAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14315004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1905 N BROADWAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
626
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - Environmental Prot Agency • PETE WILSON Governor <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION ENVIR"v F <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Smite A if i e <br /> Sacramento, CA 9582-3098 P <br /> PHONE: (916) 255-3000 ^`D <br /> n <br /> FAX: (916) 255-3015 Q 6 G <br /> 4 October 1996 <br /> Mr. Nick Nickerson <br /> Unocal <br /> 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 <br /> San Ramon, CA 94583 <br /> QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORT.• 1905 N. BROADWAY, STOCKTON <br /> Thank you for submitting the quarterly monitoring report for the June 1996 sampling event at the former <br /> PureGro/Brea Ag facility at 1905 N. Broadway Avenue in Stockton. The report is nicely written, and the <br /> hydrograph figure helps to interpret the data. After reviewing the report, I have the following comments <br /> and/or questions: <br /> 1. Table 2 needs to be updated to include the results of the March 1996 sampling event. <br /> 2. The text states that 3.6 mg/1 NO3 N was detected in MW-7, while Table 2 shows that 16 mg/I was <br /> detected. Which is correct? <br /> 3. In Table 2, the entry for 1,2-DCP detected in MW-2 is "54 (+5.0)"? What's this mean? <br /> 4. The last paragraph on page 6 states that MW-8 appears to be influenced by local irrigation pumping. <br /> What is the basis for this statement? Are any of the other monitoring wells impacted? <br /> 5. Split samples were collected in June, and submitted to two different laboratories. The labs reported <br /> significantly different results for several of the chemicals. Additional split samples are necessary to <br /> determine why this difference exists. Unfortunately, since the monitoring report was not submitted in <br /> time, it was not possible to collect splits during the September sampling event. Therefore, splits will <br /> be required during December's groundwater sampling. <br /> 6. In the future, quarterly monitoring reports must be submitted to the Board no later than 15 days before <br /> the start of the next quarter (i.e., the September report is due by 15 November and the December <br /> report is due by 15 February). <br /> The answers to the above questions and the updated table can be included in the Third Quarter 1996 <br /> monitoring report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (916) 255-3104. <br /> WENDY WYELS <br /> Ag Regulatory Unit <br /> Mr. John Rapp, Sierra Pacific Groundwater Consultants, El Dorado Hills <br /> Mr. Jan Wagoner, Unocal, West Sacramento <br /> Mr. Mike Infurna, San Joaquin County Environmental Health, Stockton <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.