Laserfiche WebLink
/ � ) NEUMILLERO BEARDSLEE <br /> ESTABLISHED 1903 <br /> A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION•AT OINEYS&COUNSELORS <br /> 58953 -21778 <br /> LEAK S. GOLDBERG <br /> STOCKTON'OFFICE: COPY <br /> 509 W.WEBER AvE.STOCKTON,CA December 28 , 199495203-3166 <br /> (209)948.8200 <br /> (209)948.4910 FAX D <br /> � 7 <br /> MAILING ADDRESS: <br /> P.O.BOX 20 <br /> STOCKTON,CA Ms . Wendy Wyels AEU O <br /> 95201-3020 California Regional Water " 1594 <br /> MODESTO Quality Control Board <br /> (209)577-8200 <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH(209)577.4910 FAX Sacramento, California 95827-3098 PERMIT/SERVICES � <br /> Re : Koppel Stockton Terminal n • / <br /> Dear Ms . Wyels : ULL d�13Da� �QO � <br /> We represent the owner of the Koppel Stockton <br /> BP-bo� <br /> Terminal located at 2025 West Hazelton in Stockton, <br /> California. On August 29 , 1994 , the Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board issued a Request for an <br /> Investigation on the above referenced site. The Request <br /> states in pertinent part: "The County Air Pollution <br /> Control District made numerous air quality citations as <br /> they observed fertilizer particles and dust being released <br /> during loading operations . Pursuant to a Public Records <br /> Act request, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution <br /> Control District conducted a thorough review of the files <br /> and was unable to locate or identify the alleged <br /> citations . <br /> One Notice of Violation ( "NOV" ) was issued at the <br /> site for visible dust emissions . The NOV was not issued <br /> as a result of or in relation to loading fertilizers as <br /> stated in your August 29 , 1994, letter. The NOV, a copy <br /> of which is attached for your information, was issued to <br /> Delgado & Associates Construction on April 22, 1992, for <br /> visible dust. As you will see from the field notes and <br /> other documentation, the dust was a result of cleaning the <br /> facility after the fertilizer operations ceased and in <br /> between tenants . The NOV was issued to the contractor who <br /> was sandblasting the facility and not to the owner or <br /> operator of the fertilizer business . This NOV was not <br /> related to the fertilizer loading operation. Moreover, <br /> the emissions were not identified as fertilizer particles <br /> or nitrates . <br /> If the Regional Water Quality Control Board has <br /> information not contained in the San Joaquin Valley <br /> Unified Air Pollution Control District files , we would <br /> 25134-1 <br />