COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I absorbed with absorbent were transported to the return cantor by an unlicensed hauler and without 2 a manifest as required by law. I -1 33. In September 2005,an inspection of the NVakMart store at 479 McKinley Street in 4 Corona,Riverside,County, revealed that spills of waste oil were being, cleaned with absorbent and 5 then thrown in the municipal trash. 6 34, In April 2002, local officials in Solano County,California received a citizen report of a child playing on a pile of yellowish,colored,powder near the,garden department at a Wal- Mart store in Vacaville, Callromia. The Deputy.Agriculture. Commissioner was dispatched atid 9 observed piles of multi-colored unknown fertiliser type substances and torn sacks of ammonium 10 sulfate. Subsequent investigations revealed that for apariod of severalyears, the Vacaville Wal- 11 a.1-II Mart had failed to comply with California environmental laws related to the storage,handling, 12 and disposal of hazardous waste and,materjals, namely fontilizers, pesticides, arid herbicides sold in its garden ctritcr. I3 35. In late 2,005, the Attommy General's Office joined with the District Attorneys' 14 offices in various counties in the.State oCaliforniaCaJifornia tc,coordinate investigation of Wal-Mar. The 15 investigation focused on violations of California laws regarding ifle�gal disposal,transportation, 16 and storage of hx/,ardous wastes, as well as compliance with hazardous materials management 17 plan requirements for each California rac-11ity. 18 36. As a result of the above-referenced investigation,plaintiff 1 or 0 believes Naintiff i 9 inr m.� do d be i v 19 and thereupon alleges that Wat-Mart has violated-provisions of the following statutes, including 20 implementing regulations associated with each of the statutes and any related permit,rule, 21 standard, or requirement issued or promulgated pursuant to these statutes,at California Facilities 22 within the time period applicable to this action-. Chapter 6.5 ofthe Health and Safety Code, 23 section 25 100 et seq., Chapter 6.7 of the Health and Safety Code, section 25290 et seq., and 24 Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code,section 25500 et seq. 25 37 Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that Wal-Mart engaged in 26 conduct or failed to act in a manner that violated provisions of the statutory and legal 27 requirements identified in the preceding paragraph, including l ut not limited to the following: 28 it COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT MUNCTION,CML PENALTMS AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF