Laserfiche WebLink
I This,Stipulation for Entry ofFinal Judgmcrit'on Consent e'Consent.judgment")Js ontered <br /> I into by Plaintiff,the People of the Stateof Catif 0 n Ie'")and Defendant WaWart Stores, <br /> r i a P op <br /> 3. I'ncX"Wdt4M4vfI. For purposes of this Consent Judgment the People and Wal-Mart.shall be <br /> 4 reforrad tip collectively-as"Partie$"anti individually a4.;'14arty ' <br /> 5 INTRODEGLION <br /> 6 This.matter relates to the.People's investigation into Wal-Mart's compliance with state laws <br /> 7 and regulations governing the storage, handling,treatment,transportation,and disposal of <br /> ha 40044-.waste xg'pd haz Mow materials pursuant­wHealth-',aild 'Safety Code rs 4.5, 6.3, <br /> And 4191,5 at wkkMaws operating retail.fac i1ities,inCalifornia on and before llebruaryv 22,201.0. <br /> 10 As set forth 00 n hi��,1 t. C9111plaintfiled concurrently herewidiho"Com the People allege <br /> R ,int <br /> pla <br /> I that Wal-Mart violated Chapters 6.5,6.7,and 6.95-o Division2 health ty <br /> 0 of the H and Safe. Code <br /> 12 and the ragulatiops promulgated under these chapters, and Business arfd-Pro-fess-ions Code soption <br /> 13 17200,et seq., by its improper storage, handling,transportation,and disposal of hazardous waste <br /> 14 antlhazarOous materials at.andfrom WalwMart's California facilities from January 15,2100.1, <br /> 15 through arid inciv-ding February 2.2,2010. <br /> The'Parties engaged in swalcment negotiations prior to the filing of"this Consent Jodgmen t. <br /> 17 1n these negotiations,Clic People e were represented by the Attorney General ofth e State of <br /> 18 California and die District Attorneys for the counties of Los Angeles,Monterey, Orange., <br /> 19 Riverside miento, San Bernardino, , , , additional <br /> San Diego, San Joaquinand Solanoand the addi <br /> ,, Sacra <br /> 20 District Attorneys who are signatories to this Consent Judgment, Wal-Mart was represented by <br /> 21 Gibson, Dunn,& Crutcher U.P. <br /> 212 'rhe People believe that the resolution embodied in this Consent Judament is fair and <br /> Z <br /> 23 reasonable and fulfills the People's eafbrcemeritok jectivos;that the to iris of the Consent <br /> 24 Judgment are appropriate;that no'further action is warranted conceming the specific violations <br /> 25 allegod in the Complaint,except as provided in this Consent Judgment;and that entry of this <br /> 26 Consent Judgment is in the best interest of the public. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> 4 <br /> $TIPULATIONFOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDOMENT ON CONSENT <br />