My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO PRE 2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
4315
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0518401
>
COMPLIANCE INFO PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2019 11:31:52 AM
Creation date
1/2/2019 4:38:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2017
RECORD_ID
PR0518401
PE
2220
FACILITY_ID
FA0003831
FACILITY_NAME
WATERLOO FOODMART
STREET_NUMBER
4315
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215-2305
APN
08710034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4315 E WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I spoke to Sagar <br /> and <br /> he stated you asked what was inside and he said it is "empty" . You also asked when do you guys use the "un used" <br /> absorbent and he told you when we have a gas spill,we clean it up and put in" <br /> used" bucket. There's <br /> a mis <br /> -communication,You also asked him him <br /> when the "used "absorbent was picked up and he didn't know date, but never the less it is always in the manifest file <br /> in the blue accordion which you checked. <br /> The absorbent was picked up almost end of August 2017, . I can pull video surveillance as well of the inspection. This <br /> is the second time I have confirmed with him of your conversation. We have No reason to argue if we were <br /> wrong. We have been told when we have "used "absorbent To put haz mat sticker on bucket, but none in there it was <br /> empty. So again,we are aware of the sticker that needs to be placed on the "used" <br /> absorbent buckets. Also, I do not see an amended inspection taking off the violation of the filter manifest not <br /> found. We had no filter changes there. I do not want this on our record. <br /> thank you for your time in <br /> this matter. <br /> Sent from RECEIVED <br /> my iPhone <br /> r;i+',I 022017 <br /> > OnOct13, <br /> 2017, at 8:39 <br /> AM, Betty Ho [EH] ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> <bho@sjcehd.com> DEPARTMENT <br /> wrote: <br /> > Hi and <br /> thank you for the <br /> statements. I am unable to close violation <br /> 605 because the bucket was not empty when <br /> inspectors were on site.According to Mr. Sagar, there <br /> were used absorbent inside the bucket when we asked what <br /> was inside the bucket. <br /> Please send a <br /> corrective <br /> statement addressing the <br /> labeling issue.Thank you. <br /> -----Original <br /> Message----- <br /> From: <br /> Rupi <br /> Padda [mailto:lakewoodchev@yahoo.com] <br /> >Sent:Thursday, <br /> October <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.