Laserfiche WebLink
are located.The facility diagram must identify the location of and mark as "exempt"underground tanks that are <br /> otherwise exempted from the requirements of this part under§112.1(d)(4).The facility diagram must also include all <br /> transfer stations and connecting pipes, including intra-facility gathering lines that are otherwise exempted from the <br /> requirements of this part under§112.1(d)(11)... (EPA Guidance Attached) <br /> Violation#602-Plan failed to discuss equivalent environmental Protection,if applicable. <br /> Response submitted stated that"The SPCC Plan was amended to include a discussion of the documented monthly <br /> inspections of the 300 and 500-gallon tanks as equivalent environmental protection.The SPCC now describes how <br /> Northwest Pipe Company personnel will perform monthly inspections,documenting the condition of the exterior of the <br /> each container for signs of deterioration,discharges,or accumulation of oil inside secondary containment"The SPCC <br /> plan states the following on section 6.2.8 Overfill Prevention Systems"The 300-gallon gasoline AST,the 500-gallon oil <br /> ASTs are not equipped with overfill prevention systems BUT are under rain cover(awning)and within the concrete <br /> containment described above.The emergency generator diesel fuel(belly)tank is also not equipped with an overfill <br /> prevention system. Facility personnel are present throughout the filling operations to monitor the product level in these <br /> tanks as transfer is occurring..." <br /> Observations/comments: It is stated in the return to compliance corrective actions that an environmental equivalence <br /> discussion of the documented monthly inspections of the 300 and 500 gallon tanks. The section dealing with <br /> environmental equivalence,according to the cross reference(112.7(a)(2)is discussed in section 5.1(page 11)of the <br /> SPCC plan states that "unless stated otherwise,this SPCC plan conforms to the general requirements for spill <br /> prevention,control,and countermeasure plans required by 40 CFR§112.7." I could not find any other section that dealt <br /> with environmental equivalence. If making an environmental equivalence claim,the industry standard that applies to <br /> the tanks should be identified and you must state the reasons for nonconformance in your Plan and describe in detail <br /> alternate methods and how you will achieve equivalent environmental protection. See violation 711 for guidance on this <br /> issue. Furthermore an environmental equivalence cannot make use of existing requirements under SPCC regulations, <br /> such as the"frequent inspection of the inspect the outside of the container for signs of deterioration,discharges,or <br /> accumulation of oil inside diked areas'which is a requirement under 40 CFR 112.8(c)(6) (see attached guidance) <br /> As a note <br /> The overfill prevention is to avoid discharges during the filling activities.The SPCC plan does not explain how an awning <br /> would prevent a tank from avoiding discharges during the filling activities.The SPCC plan states there is no overfill <br /> prevention system in place but it seems like the facility personnel being present to monitor the product level in the <br /> tanks is being presented as an overfill prevention system. Per SPCC guidance(page 3-11)A procedure for smaller <br /> containers that ensures communication between the container gauger and the pumper,is in accordance with <br /> §§112.8(c)(8)(iii)and 112.12(c)(8)(iii)and therefore does not require an environmental equivalence determination. <br /> Guidance attached) <br /> Violation#711 -Failed to Perform scheduled tank tests or inspections by appropriately Qualified Personnel. <br /> Response submitted stated Integrity testing was conducted by a certified SP-001 inspector on March 8, 2019.A copy of <br /> the test results was forwarded to the EHD on May 7th,2019.Testing/inspections for all qualified tanks per industrial <br /> standards are addressed in the SPCC Plan. <br /> Observations/comments:The SPCC plan and other sections of the SPCC plan state that the mobile refueler is not defined <br /> as a bulk storage container.This goes against SPCC regulations and EPA guidance/interpretation. Under SPCC regulations <br /> the mobile refueler is a bulk storage container under certain conditions and is only exempt from the requirement of <br /> having sized secondary containment. Per a description of how the mobile refueler is used,it meets the definition of a <br /> mobile refueler under SPCC regulations and would be considered a bulk storage container. Furthermore the 10,000 <br /> gallon tank is the only tank that has an industry standard referenced and it does not follow the STI SP-001 standard,the <br /> standard requires an annual inspection by facility personnel,in addition to monthly inspections.The STI SP-001 <br /> checklists have been attached. More information on the standard can be obtained herethis is not based of the most <br /> recent edition of the standard and is only a brief overview. The other bulk storage tanks need an industry standard <br /> 2 <br />