Laserfiche WebLink
If an owner or operator deviates from applicable industry standards to develop an integrity testing program,then a PE <br /> must certify an environmentally equivalent alternative in the SPCC Plan.The Plan must provide the reason for the <br /> deviation, describe the alternative approach,and explain how it achieves environmental protection equivalent to the <br /> applicable industry standard. <br /> Page 7-45 of the"SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors," <br /> In any case where the owner or operator of a facility uses an alternative means of meeting the integrity testing <br /> requirement of§112.8(c)(6)or§112.12(c)(6),the SPCC Plan must provide the reason for the deviation, describe the <br /> alternative approach,which is most likely to be a site-specific inspection program (i.e., hybrid inspection program), and <br /> explain how it achieves equivalent environmental protection(§112.7(a)(2)),while considering good engineering practice <br /> and industry standards. In cases where industry standards apply to a container,the PE would need to explain how an <br /> inspection or test that deviates from an applicable industry standard is environmentally equivalent to following <br /> established industry standards and how it will be implemented in the field.This determination is site-specific and based <br /> on good engineering practice as determined by the certifying PE.The hybrid inspection program should include the <br /> recommended minimal elements described in Section 7.5.3 for a PE-developed site-specific integrity testing program. <br /> Figure 7-4 provides a summary of integrity testing and inspection program documentation for bulk storage containers at <br /> onshore facilities,by type of SPCC Plan and standard applicability case. <br /> Page 7-45 of the"SPCC Guidance for Regional Inspectors," It maybe appropriate to deviate from portions of an industry <br /> standard under certain circumstances.Although the Plan preparer must determine,in accordance with industry <br /> standards,the appropriate qualifications for personnel performing tests and inspections,and the frequency and type of <br /> testing and inspections when developing the inspection and/or testing program,the inspection program can deviate <br /> from a portion of a standard when another approach would be more appropriate or cost effective, based on site specific <br /> factors.The SPCC Plan must document the environmentally equivalent alternative,the reason for deviating from the <br /> rule requirement,and describe the alternative method in detail, including how it is environmentally equivalent.143 The <br /> PE should document in the Plan what industry standard applies,how the hybrid inspection program deviates from the <br /> applicable industry standard,and how the inspection program meets the minimal recommended elements described in <br /> Section 7.5.3. <br /> Violation#726-Plan failed to adequately describe overfill Prevention methods for each container. <br /> Response submitted stated The mobile refueler is not defined as a bulk storage container. When not in use(parked)it <br /> will be located or positioned to prevent discharges as described in 112.7(b)The containment method for the mobile <br /> refueler has been identified on SPCC plan. Northwest Pipe Company hereby commits to park the mobile refueler under <br /> the awning—25U west of SW Corner of employee parking lot.Overfill protection in accordance with 40 CFR <br /> 112.8(c)(8)(iv)to avoid discharges are in use at this facility.The SPCC plan was amended to include discussion of overfill <br /> protection procedures followed during transfer operations involving all APSA regulated tanks. <br /> Observations/comments: See comments for Violation#711 on why the mobile refueler is a bulk storage container and <br /> needs to comply with regulations of bulk storage containers, 40 CFR 112.8 with the exemption of sized secondary <br /> containment. Following are the regulations from which the decision not to close the violations was made <br /> 40 CFR§312.81c1(8) <br /> (8) Engineer or update each container installation in accordance with good engineering practice to avoid <br /> discharges.You must provide at least one of the following devices: <br /> (i) High liquid level alarms with an audible or visual signal at a constantly attended operation or surveillance <br /> station. In smaller facilities an audible air vent may suffice. <br /> (ii) High liquid level pump cutoff devices set to stop flow at a predetermined container content level. <br /> (iii) Direct audible or code signal communication between the container gauger and the pumping station. <br /> 4 <br />