Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 4.0 <br /> RESULTS <br /> The test results are summarized in Tables 4-1 through 4-4. The average results are <br /> compared to the permit limits in Table 1-1. Particulate test runs 1 and 2, conducted on February <br /> 27, were thrown out due to sample contamination. However, their flow rate measurements were <br /> valid, and so were used in calculation of the hydrocarbon emission rates in Table 4-3. The <br /> results from runs 3-PM, 4-PM and 5-PM, conducted on February 28, are presented in this <br /> report. The tests for NO,, and CO emissions were run concurrently with the ammonia emissions <br /> tests on March 5, 1997. The ammonia test results are presented in the report for toxic <br /> emissions. <br /> The raw field data sheets are provided in Appendix C. Sample calculations are shown <br /> in Appendix D, and laboratory reports in Appendix E. CEM strip charts are in Appendix F, <br /> and chain of custody sheets for the samples are in Appendix G. <br /> The test results show that the emissions were within permit limits for the Stockton <br /> facility. Emissions have been reported in units consistent with permit limits, and removal <br /> efficiencies have been calculated based on the permit requirements. NO, and SO2 removal <br /> efficiencies were better than permit requirements in all cases. <br /> The particulate emissions results have been corrected for the formation of ammonium <br /> sulfate salt in the impingers. A similar correction for ammonium chloride was not included. <br /> The total particulate was so low that the chloride analysis would be near the detection limit. <br /> Therefore, the particulate results were reported corrected for ammonium sulfate only, as <br /> prescribed by SCAQMD Method 5.3. <br /> r <br /> 302108/R143B179.N 11 CVT <br />