Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 13 <br /> Section II Closures <br /> appropriate data for Appendix A <br /> In addition, the following information and <br /> shall be submitted when evaluating Case 2 Closures. All conditions listed in <br /> Case #2 (page 9) must be met. <br /> SITE HISTORY <br /> 1. se, and type of tank removed, and <br /> Describe the size, age, condition, ustem and existing buildings on <br /> submit a map showing the former tank sy <br /> site. <br /> 2. Submit an evaluation of the inerntorestimaterecords <br /> thereviewed <br /> quantityfor <br /> Ofthe <br /> product <br /> months prior to removal in ord <br /> released• of past site information, such as precision test <br /> 3. Submit a summary <br /> results , tank repairs or construction activitieS <br /> this site previously? <br /> 4. What types of businesses operateme d <br /> daper month for each tank? <br /> 5. What was the product <br /> 5. Submit a survey of nearby wells. <br /> 7. List other sources of site specific information cUtility <br /> checked (e.g' State <br /> Company, Public Works Department, Dy and State Geologic Survlocal fire <br /> and County Health Department, Count and Regional Planning, <br /> departments, etc.) . <br /> SITE CHARACTERISTICS free product, <br /> 1 . Describe evidence of leakage present (e.g• stained soil , <br /> odors , etc.) . , <br /> 2. Describe visible preferential pathways (sand lensroot hales, etc.) in <br /> the excavation pits. <br /> 3. Submit site map of surface}watsewers ssepticstanks�kutility alines, etc.) <br /> possible subsurface conduits <br /> in the vicinity of the site. <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> If the answer to any of the following i, N`0, full explanations are required) <br /> ( <br /> I . Were additional samples (other than the minimum required) taken where <br /> obviously contaminated soil was present? <br /> 2, Did sampling and analytical protocols conform to standards described in <br /> LllFT and this document? lyses used (see Table 2)? <br /> 3. Were the appropriate laboratory ana <br /> 4. Were the laboratory analysis and wereCsresults <br /> amples tsubmitteaken d? <br /> the sidewalls <br /> a. In cases of high water table, a) <br /> and b) was water present in the excavation pit. <br /> 5. Were soil samples taken for every 20 lineal <br /> feet <br /> eet of underground piping? <br /> 7. Were depth and location of soil samples <br /> sub-2I- <br /> z <br />