My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ARCH
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508378
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 1:49:41 PM
Creation date
2/4/2019 1:44:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0508378
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0008049
FACILITY_NAME
ARCH ROAD PROJECT (GIANNECCHINI)
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
ARCH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
ARCH RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> NORCAL <br /> URS Greiner <br /> January 25, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> South Area <br /> For the geophysical survey in the South Area, we used the GPR and EMLL methods. Magnetic <br /> ' interference caused by the overhead structure precluded the use of the VMG method in this <br /> area. We used the GPR to obtain shallow subsurface information that may indicate the <br /> presence of a UST. This method is typically unaffected by above ground metal objects. We <br /> ' used the EMLL method to detect near surface metal objects that may indicate an UST. <br /> Descriptions of the VMG, GPR, and EMLL methods are provided in Appendix A, of this report. <br /> DATA ACQUISITION <br /> Horizontal Control <br /> ' In both survey areas, site definition and data acquisition were based on a horizontal control <br /> grid. We used spray paint to mark the grid nodes on 10 by 10 foot centers. During data <br /> acquisition, measurement points between grid nodes were located by pacing. The location <br /> ' of the TC and IPC survey boundary, and the GPR traverses, is shown on Plate 1 . The specific <br /> locations of the grid nodes are not shown. <br /> ' Geophysical Survey <br /> In the North Area, we obtained VMG data at 5 foot intervals (stations) along south-north <br /> ' trending traverses spaced 5 feet apart. Following data acquisition, we downloaded the data <br /> to a portable laptop computer and produced preliminary contour maps in the field. We <br /> reviewed these maps for locations of VMG anomalies that may represent UST's. We then <br /> ' obtained GPR data over these anomalies along west-east and south-north trending traverses <br /> that ranged in length from 30 to 90 feet. The EMLL equipment was operated systematically <br /> over the entire survey area. <br /> tIn the South Area, we obtained GPR data along south-north trending traverses spaced 5 feet <br /> apart. These traverses ranged in length from 60 to 150 feet. The location of the GPR <br /> ' traverses are shown on Plate 1 . The EMLL technique was scanned along these same <br /> traverses. <br /> ' DATA ANALYSIS <br /> Computer Processing <br /> We down loaded the VMG data to a portable computer using the software package "Envimap" <br /> by Scintrex, Ltd. We then used the computer program "Surfer" by Golden Software to <br /> ' calculate an evenly spaced array of values (gridded) based on the observed field data. We <br /> also used Surfer to contour the gridded values and produce the VMG contour map shown on <br /> Plate 2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.