Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> NORCAL <br /> URS Greiner <br /> January 25, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> South Area <br /> For the geophysical survey in the South Area, we used the GPR and EMLL methods. Magnetic <br /> ' interference caused by the overhead structure precluded the use of the VMG method in this <br /> area. We used the GPR to obtain shallow subsurface information that may indicate the <br /> presence of a UST. This method is typically unaffected by above ground metal objects. We <br /> ' used the EMLL method to detect near surface metal objects that may indicate an UST. <br /> Descriptions of the VMG, GPR, and EMLL methods are provided in Appendix A, of this report. <br /> DATA ACQUISITION <br /> Horizontal Control <br /> ' In both survey areas, site definition and data acquisition were based on a horizontal control <br /> grid. We used spray paint to mark the grid nodes on 10 by 10 foot centers. During data <br /> acquisition, measurement points between grid nodes were located by pacing. The location <br /> ' of the TC and IPC survey boundary, and the GPR traverses, is shown on Plate 1 . The specific <br /> locations of the grid nodes are not shown. <br /> ' Geophysical Survey <br /> In the North Area, we obtained VMG data at 5 foot intervals (stations) along south-north <br /> ' trending traverses spaced 5 feet apart. Following data acquisition, we downloaded the data <br /> to a portable laptop computer and produced preliminary contour maps in the field. We <br /> reviewed these maps for locations of VMG anomalies that may represent UST's. We then <br /> ' obtained GPR data over these anomalies along west-east and south-north trending traverses <br /> that ranged in length from 30 to 90 feet. The EMLL equipment was operated systematically <br /> over the entire survey area. <br /> tIn the South Area, we obtained GPR data along south-north trending traverses spaced 5 feet <br /> apart. These traverses ranged in length from 60 to 150 feet. The location of the GPR <br /> ' traverses are shown on Plate 1 . The EMLL technique was scanned along these same <br /> traverses. <br /> ' DATA ANALYSIS <br /> Computer Processing <br /> We down loaded the VMG data to a portable computer using the software package "Envimap" <br /> by Scintrex, Ltd. We then used the computer program "Surfer" by Golden Software to <br /> ' calculate an evenly spaced array of values (gridded) based on the observed field data. We <br /> also used Surfer to contour the gridded values and produce the VMG contour map shown on <br /> Plate 2. <br />