My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ARCH
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508378
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 2:40:12 PM
Creation date
2/4/2019 1:45:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0508378
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0008049
FACILITY_NAME
ARCH ROAD PROJECT (GIANNECCHINI)
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
ARCH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
ARCH RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Rajappan&Meyer • , Date: 1/7/99 <br /> Arch Road/Highway 99 Page: 3 <br /> 2.2 Electromagnetic (EM) and Ground-Penetrating Radar(GPR) Survey <br /> A geophysical survey will be conducted at the site to determine if USTs remain at the site <br /> of the former gas station. The survey will entail an EM and GPR survey and will be <br /> conducted at the location of the former gas station, as determined by an aerial photograph <br /> review. The EM survey measures conductivity values over a specific point to a depth of <br /> ' approximately 18 feet below ground surface (bgs). The GPR survey is a method for <br /> obtaining a continuous reflection profile of shallow subsurface features. The radar signal <br /> is sensitive to differences in electrical conductivity and relative permittivity(the ability of <br /> a material to hold an electrical charge). <br /> If no tanks are detected on site, the geophysical survey may be able to assess the location <br /> ' of the material used to backfill the excavated tanks. If this is the case, soil sampling will <br /> be conducted in the vicinity of the backfill. <br /> 2.3 Soil Borings <br /> This Work Plan details sampling to assess if the USTs leaked when the service station <br /> was in operation. If USTs are determined to be present, they will need to be properly <br /> decommissioned. This will require modification to URSGWC's and the client's <br /> ' (Rajappan & Meyer) statement of work to include tank removal, disposal, and additional <br /> soil sampling. <br /> Ten shallow soil borings will be advanced to a depth of 15 feet bgs. Subsurface soil <br /> samples will be collected utilizing a geoprobe or equivalent direct-push-technology <br /> sampling rig. Two soil samples will be collected from each borehole: one at 10 feet bgs <br /> and one at 15 feet bgs. URSGWC will continuously log each borehole in accordance <br /> with the Unified Soil Classification System. <br /> ' Samples will either be collected in acrylic sleeves or brass sleeves (depending on the type <br /> of drill rig used). The ends of the sleeves will be sealed with TeflonTM tape and <br /> polyethylene end caps, placed in a cooler, and transported under chain-of-custody <br /> ' protocol to a California-certified laboratory. <br /> All down-hole equipment will be decontaminated between sample locations. <br /> ' Each sample will be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons-diesel (TPH-D), TPH- <br /> gasoline, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and lead. Samples will <br /> ' not be analyzed for methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether (MTBE), because this additive was not <br /> used in the late 1960s. The proposed borehole locations are presented in Figure 2, and <br /> are subject to change based on geophysical survey results or results of an underground <br /> ' utility survey. <br /> R&M/Arch Rd/43-00066762.00.1000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.