Laserfiche WebLink
FROM URSO W-O SRNTR BRRBRRR 605 964 0259 1999. 11-23 16 23 #390 P 14/14 <br /> Al"l" 8I r <br /> M c_j%d e I <br /> � a a L1 <br /> Speeffietl®nsn <br /> i Total 4ength 17 38 Iry e, <br /> Diameter 2.75 to a <br /> Weight 5.50 tb <br /> Total Capacity 210,0 co <br /> Sample Container Capacity 1 ea 40.0 ml o <br /> Materials 321 Stainless Steel .� 1 <br /> Contam'fl na 7ts© <br /> VOCs Organic Salts <br /> NVOCs Enorganic Salts Contaminant species recovery in 2" diameter <br /> LNAPLs Metals wells m afree-flowing aquifer with a migra- <br /> DNAPLS tory plume <br /> instatted in flowing aquifer, the IASIS Samplor <br />�. will recover concentrations and species which <br /> other sampling methods will not. The act of <br /> purging the well, in most rases, either dilutes the <br /> sample, or -changes its chemical character. This <br /> change in most cases provides ambiguous results. <br /> oBenefits: <br /> Time for first sample (VOCs) on-site 8 miry <br /> Total time (VOCs) on-site (8 wells) 1 2 hrs <br /> Decontamination std <br /> Sampling Program Savings 80 % <br /> CL H Increased Species Recovery - 48 % <br /> Samples directly into a single 40ml VOA vial <br /> Contaminant species recovery in 2" diameter Superior in-situ depth-discrete sampling results, <br /> weds installed in a stationary aquifer with a _ <br /> non-moving or very slowly moving plume <br /> The KASIS Sampler by virtue of its <br /> sampling method, will not tend to draw into -SXR- <br /> i the well, concentrations or species not <br />■ sident in or in close proximity to the well. <br /> shown above, purging swell rlevenmicro- <br /> _ n <br /> 1"Z _.. <br /> purging) in a stationery aquifer will skew the y ' _ <br /> sampling results by drawing in species and <br /> concentrations which are not resident either <br /> in or around the well. Conversely the <br /> following bar graph shows that, in a well[ I n stfi i .- Inc. <br />