My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000194
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
B
>
1603
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543430
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000194
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2019 11:07:25 AM
Creation date
2/5/2019 9:57:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000194
RECORD_ID
PR0543430
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009377
FACILITY_NAME
CAL TRANS MAINT SHOP 10
STREET_NUMBER
1603
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
B
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16918002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1603 S B ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A10/71-51-1C <br /> 3 Is the option technically feasible in light of the <br /> situation? <br />' Option is proven technically feasible in large field- 4 <br /> scale applications under similar site conditions, <br /> media, and contaminants <br /> Option is proven technically feasible in large field- 3 <br /> scale applications under different site conditions <br /> 1 Option is not proven technically feasible in large <br /> field-scale applications 2 <br /> Option is not proven technically feasible, i e , it <br /> has failed under similar site conditions, media, 1 <br /> and contaminants or is an emerging technology <br /> 4 What are the institutional considerations? <br /> Consistent with regulations, extremely positive 4 <br /> public perception, or minimal institutional <br /> requirements concerns <br /> Consistent with regulations, extremely positive 3 <br /> public perception, or minimal institutional <br /> requirement concerns <br /> Consistent with regulations, acceptable public 3 <br /> perception, or some institutional requirement <br /> concerns <br /> Consistent with regulations, negative public 2 <br /> perception, or major institutional requirement <br /> concerns <br /> Inconsistent with regulations, negative public 1 <br /> perception, or major institutional concerns <br /> 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.