My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000194
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
B
>
1603
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543430
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000194
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2019 11:07:25 AM
Creation date
2/5/2019 9:57:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000194
RECORD_ID
PR0543430
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009377
FACILITY_NAME
CAL TRANS MAINT SHOP 10
STREET_NUMBER
1603
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
B
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16918002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1603 S B ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R10/71-51-1C <br /> be safety hazards for system operator and facility personnel and negative impact on the <br /> environment for all three options Failure of Options 7A and 7D could negatively impact <br /> the soil and groundwater Failure of Option 7B could negatively impact the air <br /> Environmental Impact - Failure of any of the three options could negatively impact the <br /> environment as discussed above All three options are expected to positively impact the <br /> groundwater quality at the site However, conducting extraction without careful control <br /> of the other surrounding sources of groundwater contamination (e g , Stockton Yard on <br /> the opposite side of B street) could draw into the site the contamination plume from those <br /> external sources and prolong the treatment time No significant negative effects of any <br /> of the three options are expected on the following land use, biology, or archeological and <br /> 1 historic sites <br /> 7 6 Selected,Remedial Action Option <br /> Based on the detailed study above, it appears that the best remedial action to implement <br /> is a combination of the following two options <br /> o In Situ Containment (Option 2) to address primarily the soil contamination <br /> issue and reduce contaminant infiltration into the groundwater And <br /> o Pump and Treat with Air Stripping to remove/reduce groundwater <br /> 1 contamination <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> 45 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.