Laserfiche WebLink
' California P <br /> Department of Transportation Revised September 23, 1994 <br /> P P <br /> Project No. 102818-01 <br /> Ninyo & Moore used Environmental Assessors, Inc Figure 1 (Location of Soil Bonngs and <br />' Monitoring Wells) to draft the monitoring well locations to create the groundwater gradient <br /> map The top of casing elevations used to create the groundwater gradient map were <br /> obtained from two previous reports (Alton Geoscience, 1992, and Environmental Assessors, <br /> Inc, 1994). No documentation was available as to whether or not the land surveys were <br /> conducted by a State of California licensed surveyor. The text of the Alton Geoscience and <br /> Environmental Assessor,Inc reports do not indicate the location of the benchmark used for <br /> the land survey, however, on Figure 1 of the Environmental Assessors, Inc. report shows a <br /> benchmark located northeast of the site lust east of South B Street It is not known whether <br /> all monitoring wells were surveyed to the same benchmark Furthermore, it is not known <br /> whether monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-12 were located by surveying or by <br /> approximation Apparently,morutonng wells MW-13,MW-14,MW-16,MW-19,MW-20, and <br /> MW-24 were surveyed to a grid system of northing and easting (Environmental Assessors, <br /> Inc, 1994, Table 2 - Survey Data for Wells) Based on the information supplied, it appears <br /> that the monitoring wells were not surveyed by a State of Califorrua licensed surveyor <br /> A summary of well construction details (Environmental Assessors, Inc., 1994, Table 4) <br /> reviewed by Ninyo & Moore indicates that the screened interval for monitoring wells <br /> MW-13,MW-14, MW-19, and MW-20 starts at approximately 65 feet, and MW-16 starts at 66 <br /> feet The depth to groundwater at monitoring well MW-13 was 64 79 feet below top of <br /> casing, therefore monitoring well MW-13 is apparently not screened through the <br /> groundwater surface and the depth to groundwater may not be representative of site <br /> conditions The depth to groundwater at monitoring well MW-16 was 65 58 feet below top <br /> of casing, therefore monitoring well MW-16 is apparently not screened through the <br /> groundwater surface and the depth to groundwater may not be representative of site <br /> conditions. The depth to groundwater was 65 60 at monitoring well MW-14, 65 50 at <br /> monitoring wells MW-19 and MW-20 The approximate top six inches of a typical threaded <br /> well screen is blank well casing, therefore, monitoring wells MW-14, MW-19, MW-20 may <br /> also not be screened through the groundwater surface and accordingly the depth to <br /> groundwater may not be representative of site conditions <br /> i <br /> 3 �dGI�Cm��®®PCS <br />