Laserfiche WebLink
MAR-24-99 16 43 From WOODWARD CLYDE ¢ T-735 P 16/34 Job-482 <br /> The No-Purse Scenario <br /> 0 (Lessons Learned) <br /> Thomas Wayne„Kabis <br /> Sibak Industries Liuuted,Inc <br /> 1520 J Industrial Avenue <br /> lrecondido,California state(92o25) <br /> 800-794-6244 <br /> Abstract <br /> Obtammg representative groundwater samples,without benefit of well purging,from most groundwater monitoring <br /> walk using newly designed sampling equipment is now possible A review of current published and unpublished <br /> literature has revealed a new, growing,and viable trend in the groundwater investigation industry Owing to the <br /> most recent move in both government and the private sector to spend less on envirortmental clean-up activitles,and <br /> since the act of purging is,in and of itself a very costly enterprise, the no-purge scenario is gaining wide acceptance <br /> Recent studies conducted at sites in several states have all reached the same conclusion,that purging a groundwater <br /> monitoring well when using a sampling instrument capable of obtaining depth-discrete samples is unnecessary in <br /> order to obtain a representative sample <br /> In an attempt to obtain representative samples of groundwater from beneath any site, environmental investigators <br /> have had to deal with many variables The variables included m their scrutiny are proper well construction, <br /> consideration of parameters to be sampled for, appropriate selection of sampling device,and the methods employed <br />® to retrieve a representahve sample Researchers,groundwater scientists and envircrtmeiital engineers have dealt with <br /> the problems of proper well construction, but the reminder of the variables have been dealt with only <br /> cursorily until very recently <br /> The results of recent studies using the 1tABIS SamplerTm suggest that the no-purge method is both a valid alt*rr;ative <br /> to the method(s)commonly accepted as standard practice for UST and RCRA/CERCLA sites w much of the United <br /> States,and +wiII provide data which is adequate to superior, ensuring environmentally protective risk management <br /> and decision making at the great ma;onty of sites <br /> Background <br /> The essential importance of groundwater quality is now recognized as development of groundwater continues to <br /> expand Monitoring of groundwater quality is becoming increasingly more unportant due to public womes over <br /> chemical contanunabon The development of new equipment and techniques for measuring contaminants ani minute <br /> concentrations without the additional production of hazardous and tosuc wastes has been added to a list of sampling <br /> concerns Accuracy and cost savings top the list of concerns surrounding the sampling and monitonng of <br /> groundwater <br /> The measure of cost savings when engaging in groundwater sampling is calibrated with many standards The most <br /> common standards involve the expenditure of manpower and raw materials for the collection of any one sample, <br /> suite of samples or for the conduct of an entire program of groundwater sampling The expenditure of manpower <br /> and use of raw materials takes on a much more complicated meaning when viewed through an established sampling <br /> plan and to a greater extant,when compiling and publishing a sampling plan <br /> 1 of 16 VW94 4 22 PM <br />