Laserfiche WebLink
MAR-24'-99 16 36 From WOODWARD CLYDE + T-TH P 01/34 Job-402 <br /> Level 3 testing involved analysis of the collected samples according to the following EPA Methods for the constituent <br /> or physical parameter identified <br /> 1 EPA 8o2o-BTEX <br /> 2 EPA 1801 -Turbidity <br /> I EPA 8000-pH, EC,Temperature <br /> [I:vaLunyuam RaZULVZ nzpan'nme <br /> The KAKIS Sampler is constructed of all 321 stainless steel, and is extromaly rugged and durable The KABIS <br /> Sampler(Model-1) is small (11W dia n 14"l)and easy to handle and operate There are no moving parts,and <br /> decontamination is a simple affair, requiring only a three-bucket wash cycle(detergent/cloar nnsv/DI nnse) <br /> The mean evaluation scorn of the Barcelona rating(1984)was usod as a comparison and a"weighted"average was <br /> computed for the NARIS Sampler scoring represented in Tam 3 is a tabulated mean of a total of 16 separate <br /> questwnnalres completed by 16 different users Using the criteria first shown on TA13L E 2, the KABIS Sampler was <br /> evaluated against the bailer <br /> 1,1Nl°1MMS RESULTS REPOR' rR'a <br /> General-The analyses of both pro-and post-purging for the KABIS Sampler were compared,as were the analyses <br /> for the oheokrrAlve b6ulor and the KABIS Sampler Semplrng error analysis was oonduated to accordance with <br /> appropnate EPA statistical error analysis procedures <br /> Pre-Purge vs. Post-Purge-The analysis results were compared for recovered contaminant concentration The <br /> pro-purge samples (obtained using the KABIS Sampled showed a dramatically higher recoverable concentration in all <br /> wells,(contrary to the consequence presented in the literature) The physical parameters of conducbvity(EC), <br /> hydronium ion concentration(pH),and temperature(T"C)were checked for pre-and post-purge conditions and <br /> showad that there was little difference indicated <br /> Chock valve 9aller vs the K481S Sampler-Comparison of the recovered total petroleum hydrocarbon values initially <br /> indicate that a higher concentration of dissolved contaminants was captured by the check-valve bailer Upon closer <br /> inspection of the depths of penetration and retrieval of both samplers,however, reveals this difference to be a <br /> function of vertical concentration distribution rather than capture capability There are numerous analysis and <br /> sampling errors associated with the check-valve bailer which is too dependent on technique;the KABIS Sampler <br /> requires no particular technique for its use. <br /> An evaluation of the relationship between total petroleum Hydrocarbon capture and volatile loss between the <br /> Check-valve bailer(CVS)and the KABIS Sampler(KS)was conducted.The following method was used <br /> fge��l4i®ea 9 AJ_ <br /> These two equations can be alternately shortened to <br /> 0 <br /> 6 of 14 3124!99 4 21 PM <br />