Laserfiche WebLink
'F'V'aABJS Sampier <br /> e7 <br /> Mode _C <br /> 'WTG� Qum ANU <br /> Total Length 17 38 in <br /> Diameter 2.75 in as <br /> Weight 6 50 ib ' <br /> P <br /> Total Capacity 210 0 cc G E <br /> Sample Container Capacity 1 ea 40 0 ml <br /> Materials 321 Stainless Steel <br /> C�m Qc-�1MOM a)wao <br /> VOCs Organic Salts � <br /> NVOCs Inorganic Salts Contaminant species recovery in 2"diameter <br /> LNAPLs Metals wells m aired-flowing aquifer with a migra- <br /> DNAPLS tory plume. <br /> Installed in a flowing aquifer, the KABIS Sampler <br /> wrill recover concentrations and species which <br /> other sampling methods will not The act of <br /> purging the wall, in most cases, either dilutes the <br /> sample, or changes its chemical character. This <br /> change in most cases provides ambiguous results. <br /> # y Time for first sample {VOCs} on-site 8 min <br /> - Total time (VOCs) on-site (8 wells) 12 hrs <br /> _ Decontamination std. <br /> Sampling Program Savings 80 % <br /> Increased Species Recovery 48 % <br /> Samples directly into a single 40ml VOA vial <br /> Contaminant species recovery in 2"diameter Superior in-situ depth-discrete sampling results <br /> wells installed in a stationary aquifer with a <br /> non-moving or very slovAy moving plume. <br /> The KABIS Sampler by virtue of its- <br /> sampling <br /> tssampling method, will not tend to draw into i E <br /> the well, concentrations or species notL 4 ' <br /> resident in or in close proximity to the well. <br /> As shown above, purging a well(even micro- <br /> purrging) in a stationery aquifer will skew the a �' <br /> sampling results by drawing in species and <br />•concentr-ttions which are not resident either <br /> ,n or around the well. Conversely the <br /> follomring bar graph shows that, in a swell0% <br />