Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> the well followed by check-valve bailer sampling, waiting 2 hours and resampling each well <br /> using the KABIS Sampler T'. The results of the test indicated the following <br /> o There was no appreciable difference in the TPH ccentrations between the pre-purge samples <br /> collected by the KABIS SamplerTM and post-purge samples collected by the check-valve <br /> bailer <br /> o The test showed overall lower TPH concentrations in the post-purge KABIS SamplerTM <br /> samples when compared to the post-purge check-valve bailer samples, due to an improperly <br /> designed field method (i e, the KABIS Sampler was delivered to a depth of 4 feet BGW, <br /> while the bailer sampled the upper 11/2 feet of the water column.) <br /> o Comparison of relative recovery values indicated as much as a 54% increase in recoverable <br /> dissolved chemicals of concern (CoCs) in the pre-purge KAB15 Sampler TM samples as <br /> compared to the post-purge check-valve bailer samples <br /> o Comparison of overall costs showed a considerable difference between the two methods <br /> employed at the site Savings of more than 80% were shown when using the KABIS <br /> SamplerTM in a no-purge methodology scenario <br /> The WSPA Study — In 1995, under pressure to reduce the ever-increasing costs of <br /> environmental cleanup at petroleum contaminated sites, the Western States Petroleum <br /> Association sponsored the "California Well Purging Study" to evaluate the need for purging of <br /> groundwater monitoring wells prior to sampling It should be noted that several methods of <br /> purging (lugh-flow, low-flow, and passive) were compared in this study, as were several types <br /> of passive and active sampling devices <br /> Analysis of the collected data set supports the following three conclusions: <br /> o The results of analyzing the entire data set indicate that there is a systematic tendency <br /> toward slightly higher petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the no-purge sample than <br /> in the post-purge sample with the median value of the relative percent difference between <br /> no-purge and post purge samples being approximately 9.5 percent <br /> o The degree of variability introduced into the sampling process by the absence of purging is <br /> no larger than, and in many cases much smaller than, the variability introduced by the <br /> choice of a purging method In simpler terms, the decision to select a no-purge sampling <br /> methodology will not effect the overall variability in chemical data, and will provide a <br /> comparable, and in many cases more conservative, estimate of petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations in groundwater. <br /> o In a small population of wells/sites, an especially large discrepancy between no-purge and <br /> post- purge concentrations was found This effect appears to be due to site-specific <br /> conditions/mechanisms, is reproducible, and such wells/sites can be identified using the <br /> sampling methodologies presented in their Study. <br />