Laserfiche WebLink
SECTEONEX Risk Chereeterizetl®u <br /> the risk was inhalation of volatiles from soil and groundwater This pathway assumed that there would <br /> be no paving at the Shop 10 site The chemical that had the largest contribution to the cancer risk in <br /> groundwater ingestion was benzene(Table 6-2) <br /> In summary, inspection of Table 6-1 and Table 6-2 shows that direct soil exposures and inhalation of <br /> volatiles for occupational employees comprises the chief risk at the site (1 5E-06 using the oldest <br /> groundwater data from Table 3-4) The numbers were calculated using worse-case assumptions which <br /> would increase the possible groundwater concentrations (i e, large biodegradation half lives of <br /> 100,000 days, no asphalt or concrete paving, shallow groundwater elevation, etc) <br /> 6.3.2 Noncatcinogenic Risk <br /> Table 6-3 shows the HI for noncarcinogennc effects for all exposure scenarios A total M of 1 or less <br /> indicates that there is no cause for concern for adverse noncarcinogemc health effects The HI <br /> approach for noncarcinogemc chemicals assume that simultaneous subthreshold exposure to several <br /> chemicals could result in an adverse health effect <br /> Results for human health nsk assessment indicate that the noncarcinogenic hazard indexes are below <br /> the EPA level of concern (1 0) for all exposure pathways and all receptors evaluated for the site <br /> Combining exposure pathways for each receptor also resulted m hazard indexes substantially below the <br /> level of concern(Table 6-3) <br /> The hazard index for current and future occupational employees ranged from 2 7E-02 to 3 4E-02 <br /> (Table 6-3) The highest hazard was from direct soil exposures, soil ingestion and dermal exposures <br /> The hazard indexes for hypothetical adult residents ranged from 2 OE-04 to 7 2E-04, with the higher <br /> values associated with the resident being located 500 feet downgradnent of the site (Table 6-3) The <br /> hazard index from groundwater ingestion ranged from 2 4E-32 for a well located 500 feet <br /> downgradient using the groundwater data from 1987 to 1992 to 3 6E-57 for a well located at 1,000 <br /> feet downgradnent using all of the site's groundwater data The chemical that contnbuted the largest to <br /> the hazard was benzene <br />' In summary the hazard indexes are all significantly below one, the level of concern, even though <br /> conservative assumptions were used in the fate and transport modeling and exposure assumptions <br /> � ' ® TligGA97300BNAWOCKTONLREPORT%SHOREPM A%SNA 6-4 <br />