My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000211
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
B
>
1603
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543430
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2019 11:25:37 AM
Creation date
2/5/2019 10:40:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000211
RECORD_ID
PR0543430
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009377
FACILITY_NAME
CAL TRANS MAINT SHOP 10
STREET_NUMBER
1603
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
B
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16918002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1603 S B ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTIONS ESN gncenalnUes and Unilladons <br /> 0 Extrapolation of data from (1) high dose animal studies to low-dose human exposures, (2) <br /> acute or subchronic exposure to chronic exposure, and (3) one exposure route to another <br /> (e g, from ingestion to inhalation or dermal absorption) <br />' 0 Use of single-chemical test data that do not account for multiple exposures or synergistic <br /> and antagonistic responses <br />' 7.5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION <br /> Because there are uncertainties in each step of the risk assessment process, these uncertainties are often <br /> magnified in the final risk characterization The final quantitative estimates of risk may be one or <br /> several orders of magrutude ditlerent from the potential risk associated with a given exposure In an <br /> attempt to minimize the consequences of uncertainty, EPA guidance typically relies on use of <br /> conservative estimates of hazards in the absence of strong scientific data. The overall result is that risk <br /> estimates presented in this report are much more likely to overestimate the potential risk rather than to <br /> underestimate it <br /> In this risk assessment RMEs were used to estimate risk Average risks are considered to be best <br /> estimates, whereas RME risk represents an upperbound estimate Because RME risk estimates are <br /> based on a combination of conservative assumptions, the RME estimates are highly unlikely to reflect <br /> nsks generally encountered at the site <br /> The assessment has been prepared in a manner consistent with that generally used in the consulting <br /> community and agency guidance at the time it was prepared It is likely that nsk assessment methods <br /> and data identifying and quantifying the toxicity of chemicals will improve with time <br /> Tk,Se7*73000NAWOCKYohnaEPoRT%SHOR wo 7-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.